Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16258 (JHR)

BALENDRA GANJHU @ AJIT @ PALEDAR KUMAR BHOGTA ALIAS PALENDRA KUMAR BHOGTA v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./2482/2026 · 2026-06-11

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:16920 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 2482 of 2026 ------ Balendra Ganjhu @ Ajit @ Paledar Kumar Bhogta @ Palendra Kumar Bhogta, aged about 33 years, S/o Late Darsu Bhogta, R/o –Vill –Lachipur, Domar Toli, P.O. & P.S. –Balumath, District –Latehar, Jharkhand. … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Vishnu Prabhakar Pathak, Advocate For the State : Mr. V.S. Sahay, Addl. P.P. ------ Order No.03 Dated- 11.06.2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with S.T. Case No. 103 of 2025 arising out of Jobang P.S. Case No. 11 of 2020 corresponding to G.R. Case No. 356 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under sections 120B, 147, 148, 149, 353, 307 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 17 of the C.L.A. Act. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner being a member of TSPC Extremist organization was the member of an unlawful assembly and used criminal force against the police personnel and deterred them from discharging their duties and also attempted to murder them by firing upon them. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and no gunshot injury has been sustained by any of the police personnel. It is next submitted that the petitioner has surrendered voluntarily in terms of the Amended Resolution vide Memo No. 18/Miscellaneous. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 24.07.2025, as has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail. The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the above-named petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II, Lohardaga, in connection with S.T. Case No. 103 of 2025 arising out of Jobang P.S. Case No. 11 of 2020 corresponding to G.R. Case No. 356 of 2025 with the condition that the petitioner will co- operate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 11.06.2026 Sonu/