APHC010054582021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 3318/2021 Between: 1. SIRASAPALLI VARHALLU, S/O APPANNA AGED 55 YEARS, AGRICULTURE, R/O CHINNAGANTAYADA VILLAGE, GAJUWAKA MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, AP SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, VISAKHAPATNAM CITY POLICE COMMISSIONERATE POLICE BARRACKS, SURYABAGH VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, VISAKHAPATNAM CITY POLICE, GAJUWAKA PS VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT 4. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, GAJUWAKA PS, GAJUWAKA MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ, order, or direction, more in the nature of writ of mandamus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, declaring the action of the 4th respondent, directing him to appear before him for investigation and enquiry without any valid and justified reasons, in the absence of any complaint or any offence is pending against petitioner, but threatening petitioner with dire consequences for failure for settlement with anti social elements / land sharks in so far as it relates to 0.18 cents in Sy.No. 107/1 of Chinta Gantayda, Gajuwaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District contrary to law by Honorable Court in catena of decisions is concerned, as arbitrary, illegal, malafide and unconstitutional violating Article 14, 19 1 g and 21 of the Constitution of India, and issue consequential directions, directing the respondents, particularly the 4th respondent not to interfere with personal life and property in so far as it relates to land admeasuring 0.18 cents in Sy.No. 107/1 of Chinta Gantayda, Gajuwaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District by the petitioner as GPA Holder without following due process of law, in pursuance of representation filed by petitioner is concerned, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents, particularly 4th respondent not to interfere with personal life and property of petitioner / family members in so far as it relates to land 0.18 cents in Sy.No. 107/1 of Chinta Gantayda, Gajuwaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District without following due process of law in pursuance of representation filed by petitioner is concerned, pending disposal of the writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. S V INDIRA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: No representation for the petitioner. Even on 21.01.2026, there was no representation for the petitioner. Today, though the matter is listed under the caption “For Dismissal,” there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. 2. Learned Assistant Government Pleader submits that the petitioner was never called to the police station by respondent No.4. 3. Be that as it may, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, any Miscellaneous Petitions, if pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ DR. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Date: 28.01.2026 KKV