PAPPU SINGH NIRWAN SON OF SHRI BHANWAR SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMP/495/2026 · 2026-01-28
Anil Kumar Upman
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16252 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16252 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:3930] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 495/2026 Pappu Singh Nirwan Son of Shri Bhanwar Singh, Aged About 56 Years, Resident of Plot No. G-47, Radheshyam Dham, Petrol Pump, Murlipura, District Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus
1. State of Rajasthan through P.P.
2. Rajendra Kumar Kumawat Son of Shri Kaluram Kumawat, Resident of 301, Nali Wali Niwana, Tehsil Chomu, District Jaipur (Raj).
3. Bajrang Lal Kumawat Son of Shri Rameshwar Lal Ku- mawat, Resident of 204, Balaji Vihar C, Niwaru Road, Jhotwara, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Neeraj Sharma For Respondent(s) For Complainant(s) : : Mr. Amit Punia, PP Mr. Kailash Choudhary HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN
Order 28/01/2026
1. By way of this criminal misc. petition under Section 528 of BNSS, the accused-petitioner has approached this Court with a prayer to quash the FIR No.271/2024 registered at Police Station Samod, District Jaipur Rural (Rajasthan) for offences punishable under Sections 420, 406, 427, 447, 465, 467, 468, 471, 474, 504, 506 & 120B of IPC, on the basis of compromise.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that parties have settled their dispute amicably. It is further submitted that due to
[2026:RJ-JP:3930] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-495/2026] compromise, further proceedings in the aforesaid FIR are fruitless. The written compromise has been annexed with this petition.
3. Respondent No.2-complainant and respondent No.3 are present in person. They have duly been identified by their counsel. Under their instructions, learned counsel for complainant submits that complainant has no objection if the present misc. petition is allowed.
4. In view of the aforesaid and considering the submissions made on behalf of the respective parties; the material made available for perusal; considering the fact that parties have resolved their dispute amicably and also finding that the present case is wholly covered by the principle of law laid down by Hon'ble the Supreme Court in the case of Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr-reported in 2012 Cr.L.J. (SC) 4934 and in the case of State of Haryana & Ors. Vs. Choudhary Bhajan Lal & Ors. [AIR 1992 SC 604] and as such, the aforesaid FIR is liable to be quashed in view of compromise arrived at between the parties.
5. In view of the above, this Criminal Misc. Petition is allowed and the FIR No.271/2024 registered at Police Station Samod, District Jaipur Rural (Rajasthan), is quashed and set aside. Consequence to follow.
6. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.
(ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J LALIT MOHAN /187