Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16252 (CHH)

MINOR KUMARI SIDDHI v. RUPESH KUMAR CHAUHAN

CRR/337/2024 · 2026-01-29

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:5293 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRR No. 337 of 2024 Minor Kumari Siddhi D/o Rupesh Chauhan, Aged About 2 Months And 23 Days, Through Her Natural Guardian Poonam Yadav, (Mother of The Applicant) Aged About 36 Years R/o Atal Awas, Sharda, Vihar, Q.No. 92, Police Station Manikpur, P.S. Kotwali Korba, Tehsil And, District : Korba, Chhattisgarh ... Applicant versus Rupesh Kumar Chauhan S/o Lalluram Chauhan, aged about (Not Mentioned In The Order -Sheet), R/o H. No. N.F. 219, 220 Cseb Colony Korba East, Tehsil And, District : Korba, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent For Applicant : Mr. H.A.P.S. Bhatia, Advocate. Hon'ble Mr. Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Order on Board 30.01.2026 1. Heard Mr. H.A.P.S. Bhatia, learned counsel, appearing for the applicant. 2. The present revision has been filed by the applicant with the following prayer: “It is therefore, prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow the revision petition and the order dated 13.07.2023 may kindly be set aside and direct the non- applicant to provide enhanced maintenance to the applicant, in the interest of justice.” ABHISHEK SHRIVAS Digitally signed by ABHISHEK SHRIVAS Date: 2026.02.02 11:16:40 +0530 2 3. It transpires from the order sheet dated 01.04.2024, passed by a Coordinate Bench of this Court, that time was granted to the learned counsel for the applicant to cure the defects pointed out by the Registry of this Court, however, to date, the defects have not been cured. Furthermore, the present petition is barred by a delay of 135 days, and no application for condonation of delay has been filed. 4. Accordingly, the instant criminal revision is dismissed on this ground alone. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Abhishek