SPIRITUAL REGENERATION MOVEMENT FOUNDATION OF INDIA, NEW DELHI v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
CRMP/391/2026 · 2026-02-08
Shri Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal
Public Interest Litigationbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1625 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1625 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 391 of 2026 Spiritual Regeneration Movement Foundation Of India, New Delhi Through Authorized Representative Dinesh Chandra Khare, S/o Shri Virendra Prasad Khare, Aged About 68 Yrs, R/o Maharshi Vedic World Administration, Mig-S/phase-2, Hirapur Road, Kabir Nagar, Tehsil and District Raipur (C.G.)
... Petitioner versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh through Station House Officer, Police Station City Kotwali, Balodabazar, District Balodabazar, Bhatapara (C.G.). 2 - G.R. Chandramohan S/o Late N.G. Pillai, Aged About 68 Years R/o Flat No. 124, Ayappa Nagar, Supela, P.S. Supela, Bhilai, District Durg (C.G.)
... Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sunil Kumar Soni, Advocate For the State/R-1 : Ms. Vithika Choubey, Panel Lawyer For respondent no.2 : Mr. Quamrul Aziz, Advocate (Hon’ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal)
Order on Board 09.02.2026
1. By this petition filed under section 528 of BNS, 2023 the petitioner prays for recalling the order dated 08.08.2025 passed in CRMP.No.1246/2022 which has been dismissed as infructuous.
2
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that when the CRMP.No.1246 of 2022 was taken up for hearing, inadvertently the earlier counsel who was appearing for the petitioner had submitted that the trial has already been concluded on 12.12.2023, therefore, the petition has become infructuous and on such submission, CRMP.No.1246 of 2022 has been dismissed as infructuous. He submits that the copy of the order sheets have been produced which would show that the matter is still pending and looking to the gravity of the case, he prays for recalling of the order dated 08.08.2025.
4. The above submission of the counsel for the petitioner is not objected by the learned State Counsel.
5. Having regard to the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and for the reasons stated in the restoration application, the order dated 08.08.2025 is recalled and the CRMP. No. 1246 of 2022 is restored to its original Number.
6. Accordingly, CRMP. No.391/2026 is allowed. Sd/- (Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal) Judge Rao