GOPAL YADAV ALIAS GOPAL KUMAR YADAV v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
A.B.A./3010/2026 · 2026-06-11
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16248 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16248 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2026:JHHC:16809 ) -1- A.B.A. No. 3010 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
A.B.A. No. 3010 of 2026
Gopal Yadav @ Gopal Kumar Yadav, aged about 32 years, son of Ganesh Marik @ Ganesh Pd. Yadav, resident of Village- Nawadih, P.O. & P.S. Rikhiya, Dist.- Deoghar
… Petitioner
-Versus- The State of Jharkhand
… Opposite Party
-----
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
-----
For the Petitioner : Mr. Pramod Kumar Jha, Advocate For the State
: Mr. Shailendra Kumar Tiwari, Spl.P.P.
-----
02/11.06.2026 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the State.
2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Jasidih P.S. Case No.135 of 2026, registered for the offence under Sections 190, 191(2), 125, 126(2), 115(2), 109, 132, 351(2) and 352 of the BNS, pending in the Court of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Deoghar.
3.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that false allegation has been made against the petitioner of indulging with the police of taking away tractors which was stopped by the police for investigation. He further submits that the petitioner is a poor person and he is doing the job in a grocery shop. He then submits that only on suspicion, the petitioner has been implicated in the case. He next submits that the name of the person, who has taken name of the petitioner, has not been disclosed in the FIR. He also submits that the petitioner is having no criminal antecedent, as disclosed in paragraph 10 of this application.
4.
Learned counsel appearing for the State opposed the prayer and submits that the allegations are there of forcefully taking away the tractors from the custody of the police.
( 2026:JHHC:16809 ) -2- A.B.A. No. 3010 of 2026
5. Considering that the petitioner is having no criminal antecedent and only on suspicion, the name of the petitioner has come and the name of the person, who has taken petitioner’s name, has not been disclosed in the FIR and in the attending facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
6. Accordingly, the above-named petitioner is directed to surrender before the learned Court within three weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrender, he shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Deoghar in connection with Jasidih P.S. Case No.135 of 2026, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
(Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated: 11th June, 2026 Ajay/