- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:12393 RFA No. 1988 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1988 OF 2022 (PAR) BETWEEN: 1. SMT RADHA BHAT W/O CHETHAN D/O UMA V BHAT AND VENKATARAMA BHAT AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS 2. SRI BHUVAN S/O RADHA BHAT AGED ABOUT 11 YEARS MINOR., REP. BY HIS MOTHER/ NATURAL GUARDIAN SMT RADHA BHAT 3. KUM. SUDHA BHAT, D/O UMA V BHAT AND VENKATARAMA BHAT AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS ALL ARE RESIDING AT KATTE MANE MALLA VILLAGE AND POST KARKALA TALUK UDUPI DISTRICT-574122. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. PRASANNA V R., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI VENKATARAMA BHAT S/O KRISHNA BHAT AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS Digitally signed by PRIYANKA H M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:12393 RFA No. 1988 of 2022 2. SMT UMA V BHAT W/O VENKATARAMA BHAT AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS RESPONDENT NO.1 & 2, BOTH ARE R/AT MURUDESHWARA NILAYA THIRU NAGAR, MALLAR MAALA VILLAGE AND POST KARKALA TALUK UDUPI DISTRICT-574122. 3. MR. JNANESH GORE S/O LATE NARAYANA BHAT AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS R/AT KAYARADKA DURGA VILLAGE AND POST KARKALA TALUK UDUPI DISTRICT-576117. 4. RAJPURA CREDIT CO-OP SOCIETY BAJAGOLI BRANCH REP. BY ITS MANAGER MUDAR VILLAGE, BAJAGOLI POST KARKALA TALUK UDUPI DISTRICT-574110. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.CHANDRANATH ARIGA.K., ADVOCATE FOR R3 AND R4) THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 16.08.2022 PASSED IN O.S.NO.120/2018 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ACJM., KARKALA, PARTLY DECREEING THE SUIT FOR PARTITION. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:12393 RFA No. 1988 of 2022 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the appellants has filed a memo stating that the appeal may be dismissed as withdrawn, which reads as under: "The Appellants respectfully submit that the dispute involved in the present appeal between the parties have been amicably resolved with the intervention of elders and well wishers in the family as stated in the accompanying affidavit and therefore, they do not intend to prosecute the present appeal henceforth. Wherefore, it is respectfully prayed that the Appellants may be permitted to withdraw the above appeal and the same may kindly be dismissed as withdrawn in the ends of Justice. " 2. The aforesaid memo is taken on record. 3. In terms of the memo, the appeal is disposed of as withdrawn. Sd/- (S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE VM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 8