DEEPAK KUMAR and ANR. v. STATE OF U.P.THRU. PRIN. SECY. BASIC EDUCATION DEPTT. and ORS.
WRIA/17621/2020 · 2026-01-05
Shree Prakash Singh
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16244 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16244 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 17621 of 2020 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Case called out.
2. None is present for the petitioners to press this writ petition.
3. Learned counsel for the State is present.
4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
6. Consigned to records. January 5, 2026 AKS Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pradeep Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Shivam Sharma (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Deepak Kumar And Anr. .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P.Thru. Prin. Secy. Basic Education Deptt. And Ors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench