Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16240 (ALL)

MUKUL BANSAL AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER

A482/10757/2025 · 2026-01-05

Brij Raj Singh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 10757 of 2025 Court No. - 16 HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J. At the outset, learned Counsel for the applicants prays that he may be permitted to withdraw the instant application with liberty to file the same afresh with proper pleadings and documents in support thereof. The prayer sought has not been opposed by learned A.G.A.. In view of the above, the instant application is rejected as not pressed with the aforesaid liberty. The certified copy of the impugned order or any other certified document filed along with the application shall be returned to the learned Counsel for the applicants by retaining a photocopy of the same on record. January 5, 2026 Mohit Singh/- Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Arvind Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Brij Raj Singh,J.) Mukul Bansal And 2 Others .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- MOHIT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench