[2026:RJ-JP:3779] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1576/2026 Vinod Kumar S/o Shri Chunnilal, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Bagad Wali Dhani, Village Nindar, Police Station Harmada, Jaipur West. (Presently He Is Confined In Central Jail Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rakesh Chnadel For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sudesh Saini, P.P. Mr. B.L. Dhakar HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 28/01/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 on behalf of accused-petitioner in connection with FIR No. 662/2024 registered at Police Station Harmada, District Jaipur (West) for offences punishable under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B of I.P.C. 2. Heard. 3. Considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the accused-petitioner as well as learned public prosecutor and assisted by learned counsel for the complainant. 4. The present accused-petitioner has been arrayed as an accused only because he is the son of Chunnilal @ Chuna who is said to have sold the land to other party on the basis of forged documents, though he has earlier sold the land to the complainant and the complainant has also obtained the decree of specific [2026:RJ-JP:3779] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-1576/2026] performance from the Civil Court in his favour. The accused- petitioner is in custody since 09.01.2026. 5. From the perusal of the contents of the First Information Report, it reveals that there is no allegation against the accused-petitioner of any type. 6. Counsel for the complainant submitted that the accused-petitioner being son of the land holder Chunnilal @ Chuna is also involved in the conspiracy of selling out the land in question by preparing forged documents. 7. Learned Public Prosecutor states that accused- petitioner is merely a witness to the agreement to sale. 8. Taking into consideration overall facts and circumstances of the case and more particularly the fact that accused-petitioner is merely a witness to the alleged agreement to sale and also the fact that he is in custody since 09.01.2026, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits or demerits of the case deems just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 9. Accordingly, this bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner named above shall be enlarged on bail provided, he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- together with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for their appearance before the Court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J SHRUTI SHARMA /181