Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1623 (GAU)

KUSHAL THAKURIA v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

Bail Appln./30/2026 · 2026-02-05

Sanjeev Kumar Sharma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010288732025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./30/2026 KUSHAL THAKURIA S/O - LT BOLORAM THAKURIA VILLAGE - DAKHALA MAJPARA P.S.- PALASHBARI DIST. - KAMRUP, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM TO BE REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM. Advocate for the Petitioner : MS N BEGUM, MR S GAUTAM Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA ORDER Date : 06.02.2026 Heard Ms. N. Begum, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. B. Sarma, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State respondent. [2] This application has been filed by the petitioner namely, Kushal Thakuria under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, seeking regular bail in connection with Sessions Case No. 08/2025 Page No.# 2/2 (Corresponding to Palashbari P.S. Case No. 418/2024) under Sections 49/ 103(1)/ 3(5) of BNS, 2023, pending in the court of the learned Addl. District & Sessions Judge, Kamrup (Amingaon). [3] The learned Addl. Public Prosecutor has produced the post-mortem report which is available alongwith the scanned copy of the TCR. [4] The offence is heinous in nature and the allegation is that the accused person has brutally killed his wife. [5] Considering the gravity of the offence, despite the fact that the petitioner has been in detention for a period of 475 days and considering the stage of the trial and the vital witnesses are yet to be examined, the prayer for bail is rejected at this stage. [6] In terms of the above, this bail application stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant