Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16227 (MAD)

Balakrishnagandhi v. The State Rep By, The Inspector of Police

/9012/2026 · 2026-04-09

C Kumarappan

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL OP No. 9012 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 09-04-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN CRL OP No.9012 of 2026 1. Balakrishnagandhi S/o. Kanthasamy, No.1/18, Kizhakku Kadu, Karungalpatti Agrahara, Namakkal District. Petitioner(s) Vs 1.The State Rep By, The Inspector of Police Cyber Crime Police Station, Dharmapuri. Dharmapuri District. (Crime No. 23 of 2025) Respondent(s) PRAYER Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of BNSS, praying to enlarge the Petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest in Crime No. 23 of 2025, pending on the file of the respondent and thus render justice. For Petitioner(s): Mr.Camyles Gandhi W For Respondent(s): Mr.P.Dhileepan Govt.Advocate (Crl Side) 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 9012 of 2026 ORDER The petitioner apprehends arrest for the alleged offence under Sections 318(4) of BNS, 66D of IT Amendment Act, 2008 in Crime No.23 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police seeks anticipatory bail. 2.The allegation against the petitioner is that, he has handled the account of A1 and that the petitioner’s account has been misused. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case. 4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) would strongly oppose by stating that this petitioner as well as the first accused have cheated a sum Rs.10 lakhs to the various persons by creating false web site. He would further submit that unless the petitioner is taken custody, the question of involvement of other accused could not be elucidated. He would also submit that there are 8 NCRP complaints pending against this petitioner. 5.In view of the submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), this Court does not find any merits in this petition. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 9012 of 2026 6.Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed. 09-04-2026 kmi To 1.The Judicial Magistrate No.I Dharmapuri. 2.The State Rep By, The Inspector of Police Cyber Crime Police Station, Dharmapuri. Dharmapuri District. 3.The Public Prosecutor High Court, Chennai. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 9012 of 2026 C.KUMARAPPAN J. kmi CRL OP No.9012 of 2026 09-04-2026 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis