Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16225 (RAJ)

HARMEET SINGH S/O SARVAN SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/1446/2026 · 2026-02-11

Ravi Chirania

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:6521] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 2nd Bail Application No. 1446/2026 1. Harmeet Singh S/o Sarvan Singh, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Sahrol Talhati, Thana Shahbad, District Baran, Rajasthan. (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Baran (Raj.)) 2. Surendra Singh @ Bittu S/o Ajab Singh, Aged About 44 Years, R/o Sahrol Talhati, Thana Shahbad, District Baran, Rajasthan. (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Baran (Raj.)) ----Applicants Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Applicant(s) : Mr. Abhishek B. Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Choudhary, P.P. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI CHIRANIA Order 11/02/2026 1. This second bail application has been filed by the applicants Harmeet Singh S/o Sarvan Singh & Surendra Singh @ Bittu S/o Ajab Singh, who arrested by the police in connection with the FIR bearing No.127/2025 dated 07.10.2025 registered at Police Station Shahbad, District Baran for the offences punishable under Sections 109(1), 115(2), 126(2), 190, 191(2), 191(3), 351(2), 352(3) and 352 of B.N.S.. 2. Learned counsel submits that the first bail application was withdrawn by the applicants vide order dated 19.12.2025 with liberty to file fresh bail application after submission of the charge- [2026:RJ-JP:6521] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-1446/2026] sheet, thereafter, the applicants have preferred this second bail application under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. 3. Learned counsel submits that the Police after completing the investigation filed the charge-sheet. Learned counsel further submits that as per the contents of the FIR and the conclusion as recorded in the charge-sheet that the injuries have been assigned to the accused Surendra Singh. In view thereof, learned counsel prayed that the applicant Harmeet Singh be enlarged on bail and he is not pressing the bail application of Surendra Singh @ Bittu at this stage. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor strongly opposed the bail application. 5. This Court after considering the fact that the other co- accused Pavitra and Harvinder Singh have already been enlarged on bail, charge-sheet has already been filed, trial will take sufficient long time, nature of allegations, applicant-Harmeet Singh is behind the bar since long and grievous injuries were assigned to Surendra Singh, and learned counsel for the applicant is not pressing the bail application of Surendra Singh @ Bittu at this stage, also after considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to exercise its power under Section 483 B.N.S.S. and deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-applicant Harmeet Singh S/o Sarvan Singh on bail and the bail application of the Surendra Singh @ Bittu S/o Ajab Singh is dismissed at this stage. 6. Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that accused-applicant Harmeet Singh S/o Sarvan Singh shall be released on bail, [2026:RJ-JP:6521] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-1446/2026] provided he executes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.50,000/- to the satisfaction of learned trial Court for his appearance before that Court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. The applicant is further directed not to take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty. It is made clear that the observation as made by this Court in the bail application will not affect the trial of the case. (RAVI CHIRANIA),J Dushyant/3