DILIP DHARAMRAL PANDEY v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH MULUND POLICE STATION
REVN/276/2026 · 2026-10-07
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16222 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16222 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
40-REVN-276-2026 (CR).doc Tikam IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. NO. 276 OF 2026 Dilip Dharamral Pandey ...Applicant/s Versus State Of Maharashtra Through Mulund Police Station ...Respondent/s _________________________________________________________________ Mr. Pramod S. Kumbhar, Advocate for Applicant. Mr. B.B. Kulkarni, APP for Respondent-State. _________________________________________________________________
CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J. DATE : 7th OCTOBER, 2026.
P.C. :
1. Heard learned counsel for the Applicant and learned APP.
2. Learned APP objected to this Criminal Revision Application as the issue under challenge is regarding atrocities Act. He submits that the Applicant should have filed appeal and not criminal revision Application.
3. Considering submissions of learned APP, learned counsel for the Applicant, seeks leave to withdraw this Revision Application with liberty to file an appeal and place before the appropriate bench.
4. Leave granted. Revision Application is allowed to be withdrawn with aforesaid liberty.
5. Registry shall not raise issue of limitation while filing the appeal.
(SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.) VAISHALI ANIL TIKAM Digitally signed by VAISHALI ANIL TIKAM Date: 2026.10.08 18:12:57 +0530