Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16221 (RAJ)

MADHAV VIDHYAPEETH v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/1363/2026 · 2026-01-23

Anuroop Singhi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:3121] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1363/2026 Madhav Vidhyapeeth, Harota, Chomu, Jaipur Through Its Secretary Banna Lal Yadav S/o Hanuman Sahay Yadav, Aged About 75 Years, Resident Of 18, Ganesh Vihar, Jaipur Road, Chomu. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principle Secretary, Medical And Health Department, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. Rajasthan Nursing Council, Through Its Registrar, B-39 Sardar Patel Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 3. Registrar, Rajasthan University Of Health Science, Sector- 18 Pratap Nagar Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Munesh Bhardwaj For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUROOP SINGHI Order 23/01/2026 The defects pointed out by the registry stand overruled. Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the very outset, confines his submissions to the limited extent that the application filed by the petitioner before the respondents seeking grant of temporary NOC for B.Sc. Nursing course may be processed and decided in a time bound manner, as any further delay in consideration of the same would deprive the petitioner from running the course. [2026:RJ-JP:3121] (2 of 2) [CW-1363/2026] Considering the limited submission so made, this Court deems it appropriate to direct the respondents to decide the application filed by the petitioner for seeking grant of temporary NOC for the course mentioned therein, strictly in accordance with law and after taking into consideration all the requisites which are required to be complied with by the petitioner – Institution within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of this order. With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition as well as stay application stands disposed of. Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. Needless to say that the said direction is only to decide the application filed by the petitioner in accordance with law and does not indicate a direction to decide the application in any particular manner. (ANUROOP SINGHI),J JAYANT KUMAR /104