Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16216 (BOM)

TEJAS KIRTIKUMAR JAIN v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

REVN/434/2018 · 2026-10-07

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

12-REVN-434-2018 (CR).doc Tikam IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. NO. 434 OF 2018 Tejas Kirtikumar Jain ...Applicant/s Versus The State Of Maharashtra ...Respondent/s _________________________________________________________________ Mr. Rishav Singh i/.by Jamshed Ansari, Advocate for Applicant. Mr. Kuldeep Patil a/w. Mr. Anay Joshi, Advocate for Respondent-CBI Mr. S.M. Mangaonkar, APP for Respondent-State. _________________________________________________________________ CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J. DATE : 7th OCTOBER, 2026. P.C. : 1. Heard learned counsel for the Applicant and learned APP. 2. Learned counsel for the Applicant, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw this Revision Application. 3. Considering the request of learned counsel for the Applicant, leave is granted to the Applicant to withdraw the Revision Application. 4. Revision Application is disposed of accordingly. (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.) VAISHALI ANIL TIKAM Digitally signed by VAISHALI ANIL TIKAM Date: 2026.10.08 18:12:55 +0530