REHANA BANU ANSARI D/O SHRI NIZAMUDDIN ANSARI W/O SHRI NISAR MOINUDDIN ANSARI v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CCP/1259/2025 · 2026-03-27
Anand Sharma
Contempt Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1621 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1621 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:13026] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 1259/2025 Rehana Banu Ansari D/o Shri Nizamuddin Ansari W/o Shri Nisar Moinuddin Ansari, Aged About 46 Years, Resident Of 26, Maharishi Dadhich Nagar, Kumbha Nagar, Chittorgarh (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Medical And Health Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. Smt. Gayatri A. Rathore, Principal Secretary, Medical And Health Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur.
3. Sh. Rakesh Kumar Sharma, The Director, Medical And Health Services, Swasthya Bhawan, Tilak Marg, C- Scheme, Jaipur.
4. Dr. S.s. Agarwal, Director State Institute Of Health And Family Welfare, Jhalana Doongri, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tanveer Ahamad For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sankalp Vijay, AAG on behalf of Mr. Vigyaan Shah HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA
Order 27/03/2026
1. This contempt petition has been filed by the petitioner alleging non-compliance of order dated 20.02.2025 passed by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court whereby directions were given for granting same relief to the petitioner as granted in the case of Hakim Uddin which was passed placing reliance upon judgment delivered by Co-ordinate Bench of this court at Principal Seat Jodhpur in S.B. Civil Writ petition no. 10256/2024 (Arjun Sain v/s
[2026:RJ-JP:13026] (2 of 3) [CCP-1259/2025] State of Rajasthan & Ors.) in which following directions were given:-
"In view of the discussion made above,the writ petition merits acceptance and the same is allowed. The respondents are directed to grant 15 bonus marks to the petitioner on the basis of the experience certificate produced by him and after grant of those 15 marks, if the name of the petitioner comes in merit, he shall be given appointment on the post of Lab Technician advertised vide advertisement dated 31.05.2023, if he is otherwise eligible in all respects. It is made clear that the petitioner will be entitled to all the consequential benefits on notional basis with effect from the date on which his juniors have been given appointment. The order passed shall be complied with by the respondents within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order."
2.
Learned counsel for the respondent at the outset submitted that in compliance of order passed by this Court, State Institute of Health and Family Welfare had issued an order dated 25.03.2026 whereby petitioner has been selected on the post of Nursing Officer and it is also mentioned that her posting orders shall be issued separately.
3.
Learned counsel submits that before issuing posting orders, certain formalities are to be completed therefore issuance of posting orders may take some time.
4. In view of above statement made by learned counsel for the respondent and on the basis of above order dated 25.03.2026, this Court finds that it is not a case of deliberate and willful disobedience and no contempt is made out.
5. Therefore, this contempt petition is dismissed.
[2026:RJ-JP:13026] (3 of 3) [CCP-1259/2025]
6. Notices stand discharged.
7. It is however made clear that the respondents shall issue posting orders in compliance of order dated 25.03.2026 within a period of one month. Order dated 25.03.2026 is taken on record.
(ANAND SHARMA),J RACHNA /78