Shaik Mohammed Shabbir v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
WP/3308/2026 · 2026-02-04
Y Lakshmana Rao
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16205 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16205 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010052642026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] THURSDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 3308/2026 Between:
1. SHAIK MOHAMMED SHABBIR,, S/O LATE SHAIKSHA VALI, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, SOFTWARE EMPLOYEE AT BANGALORE PRESENTLY RESIDING AT D.NO.6/900-F2, BENCHIKOTTALA, GUNTAKAL, ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. 2. NOORUNNISA BEGUM,, W/O LATE SHAIKSHA VALI, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/O D.NO.6/900-F2, BENCHIKOTTALA, GUNTAKAL, ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. 3. ZEHERA BEGUM,, W/O LATE PATHAN NAVAZ KHAN, AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS, R/O D.NO.3/310, ARAVIND NAGAR, GUNTAKAL, ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH MANGALAGIRI, MANGALAGIRI MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT, ANANTHAPURAM. 4. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTAKAL,
2 Dr. YLR, J W.P.No.3308 of 2026 Dated 05.02.2026
ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. 5. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE S H O, GUNTAKAL I TOWN P.S, ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. 6. SHAIK RESHMA, W/O MD MEER ZULFIQUAR, R/O D.NO.7/319, BHAGYA NAGAR, GUNTAKAL, ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
T V JAGGI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
GP FOR HOME The Court made the following:
ORDER:
The Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:-
“…to issue writ order or orders specially one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the acts of the 5th respondent in calling petitioners to police station by making calls through the constables and making petitioners to sit in the police station by threatening petitioners to pay the sale consideration paid to petitioners as per the sale deed dt 09102019 with interest immediately to the 6th respondent as illegal arbitrary violative of Arts 21 of the Constitution of India and misuse of powers vested with the office of 5th Respondent and consequently desist the 5th respondent and his staff from calling petitioners to the police station and threatening to pay the sale considerations stated supra to the 6th respondent and pass….”
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Assistant Government Pleader. 3 Dr. YLR, J W.P.No.3308 of 2026 Dated 05.02.2026
3.
Sri T.V. Jaggi Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners, submits that at the behest of respondent No.6, respondent No.5 is interfering in the civil disputes pending between the petitioners and respondent No.6. 4. Sri P. Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader, on written instructions, submits that the respondent authorities are not interfering in the civil disputes. It is further submitted that one Shaik Reshma/respondent No.6 filed a PGRS application. Based on that application, respondent No.5 called the petitioners and respondent No.6 for a preliminary enquiry, and after investigating that there is a civil dispute pending between the petitioners and respondent No.6, the police have not further called them to the police station. 5. Be that as it may, since there is a civil dispute pending between the petitioners and respondent No.6, the respondent shall not interfere in the matter. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing respondent No.5 not to interfere further in the civil disputes pending between the petitioners and respondent No.6. However, the respondent No.5 is at liberty to proceed in accordance with law against the petitioners in Cr.No.09 of 2026 registered on 31.01.2026. 4 Dr. YLR, J W.P.No.3308 of 2026 Dated 05.02.2026
7. In the result, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ DR. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Date: 05.02.2026 RSI
5 Dr. YLR, J W.P.No.3308 of 2026 Dated 05.02.2026
142 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 3308 of 2026
Date: 05.02.2026 RSI