Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16204 (RAJ)

VARSHED S/O PALTU v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/1301/2026 · 2026-02-04

Sandeep Taneja

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:5307] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1301/2026 Varshed S/o Paltu, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Kot, Police Station Bahin, District Palval, Haryana. (At Present Accused Petitioner confined In District Jail Khairthal-Tijara). ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jiya Ur Rahman For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP TANEJA Order 04/02/2026 1. This bail application has been filed by the accused-petitioner under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. in connection with FIR No. 42/2025 registered at Police Station Tapukada, District Bhiwadi for the offence(s) under Section(s) 309(4), 308(2), 318(4) and 316(2) of B.N.S. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused- petitioner is an innocent person and has been falsely implicated in this case as he has nothing to do with the alleged offences. Learned Counsel further submits that the petitioner has not been identified as suspect, by the complainant, in the Test Identification parade. Counsel also submits that the alleged offences are triable by Magistrate, the petitioner has no criminal antecedent, and he is in custody since 27.12.2025 and the investigation and trial will [2026:RJ-JP:5307] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-1301/2026] take considerable time to conclude. Hence, he prays that the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail application. 4. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, particularly the facts that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent and the offences are triable by Magistrate, and without commenting anything on merits / demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 5. Therefore, this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS is allowed and accused-petitioner Varshed S/o Paltu is ordered to be released on bail, provided, he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that the petitioner shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (SANDEEP TANEJA),J SKS/136