[2026:RJ-JP:4223] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1691/2026 Abdul Samad Son of Anwar, aged 63 Years, Resident of Near Ramdev Ji Ka Chabutara, Bhisti Mohalla, Gandhi Nagar, Kishangarh, Police Station Gandhi Nagar, District Ajmer, At Present Ratna Rawat Ka Jaav, Near Poultry Farm, Chamda Ghar, Kishangarh, Police Station Gandhi Nagar, District Ajmer (At present in Central Jail, Ajmer) ----Petitioner Versus The State of Rajasthan through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shyam Bihari Gautam For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Punia, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 29/01/2026 1. This bail application under Section 483 of BNSS has been filed on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.126/2025 registered at Police Station Gandhi Nagar (Ajmer), District Ajmer for offences punishable under Sections 318(4), 316(2), 61(2) & 308(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, (in short ‘BNS’) 2023. During the course of investigation, offences punishable under Section 111(2)(b) of BNS, 2023 and Sections 3/21 & 5/21 of the Banning of Unregulated Deposit Schemes Act, 2019 have also been added against the petitioner. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel submits that co-accused persons namely- Hidayat Ali, Balveer [2026:RJ-JP:4223] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-1691/2026] Vaishnav and Narendra @ Nanu have already been granted benefit of bail by this Court as well as co-ordinate Bench of this Court. It is submitted that trial will take considerable time in its conclusion. Counsel submits that petitioner is in custody since 06.01.2026 and further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the bail application. He submits that petitioner is habitual offender as twenty three other cases have been registered against him. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, as also the fact that aforesaid co-accused persons have already been granted benefit of bail by this Court as well as co-ordinate Bench of this Court and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion as well as looking to the custody period, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application. 6. 6. The bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner- Abdul Samad Son of Anwar shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.5,00,000/- (Rupees Five Lakh only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.2,50,000/- (Rupees Two Lakh Fifty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. [2026:RJ-JP:4223] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-1691/2026] 7. Considering the criminal antecedents of the petitioner, it is made clear that the petitioner shall not involve in similar offence(s) during currency of bail granted by this Court. The petitioner is further directed to mark his presence in the concerned police station in first week of every month, till trial is concluded. 8. Concerned SHO shall enter the attendance of the petitioner in the Roznamcha. In case the petitioner fails to mark his presence in the concerned police station, as directed above, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to the concerned Court in this regard. 9. If breach of any of these conditions is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial Court to cancel the bail granted to petitioner by this Court. 10. Office is directed to send copy of this order to the concerned SHO for necessary compliance. 11. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J LALIT MOHAN /34