Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16193 (PNJ)

RAJENDER v. STATE OF HARYANA

CRM-M/11949/2026 · 2026-03-24

Subhas Mehla

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

   -1-      IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH   CRM-M-11949-2026 Decided on: 24.03.2026    …...Petitioner Versus    …...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA Present: Mr. Mohan Singla, Advocate                      **** SUBHAS MEHLA, J. (Oral)                      !"  #$"%"&'        ()*$ +&  , %" "%"+      + & % &&! &&+-&. &/&!- .  # $  -#$."%"& 0    "%1# , +, +! + "%)23  2   3 4 5    "   #    6  0  4 63      7  8   ' )          '9*             6     6     SONIA PURI 2026.04.15 13:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document    -2-       6   6  ' )    6      6 0   ()*  &   5                         6     :       0        :    00              6                3 0   ' 0  :     4    4 4     6             3       7  8    5               ;  4      $ 6   <   )     4                               1                    that the petitioner has been specifically named in the FIR and despite repeated attempts, the petitioner did not join the investigation; upon further inquiry, the Sarpanch of the Village Kuleri gave in writing that there is no person named Deepak son of Inder Singh in the said village. Learned State counsel further contended that the allegations are serious in nature and custodial interrogation of the petitioner is required and hence, the petitioner does not deserve the SONIA PURI 2026.04.15 13:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document    -3-      concession of anticipatory bail as the petitioner alongwith co-accused committed fraud with the Court by furnishing false surety. +     ,      4 0                               6  0  446           4   66 :   0 0    ' 0            4    6     4           ' 0    6                       66           =  7  4        3     4     >1                  )  *       ? 6 3 6 @  6            6   6       6 6  6  0  01             0     66   !   )  4 0  4                                 6   SONIA PURI 2026.04.15 13:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document    -4-      9. Nothing observed herein shall be construed as  >      3 6;    (SUBHAS MEHLA) JUDGE 24.03.2026 Sonia Puri Whether Speaking/Reasoned: YES/NO  Whether Reportable: YES/NO  SONIA PURI 2026.04.15 13:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document