Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29857 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-825 Year-2025 Thana- RAMKRISHNANAGAR District- Patna ====================================================== Pankaj Sahani Son of Upendra Sahni Resident of Village- Balgudar, ps- Lakhisarai, Dist- Lakhisarai presently Residing at Shri krishna Colony, pashchimiyachak, Ps- Ramkrishna nagar, Dist- patna ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Rakesh Kumar Sharma, Advocate. Mr. Alok Anand, Advocate Mr. S.M. Sudhanshu, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Nitya Nand Tiwary, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 2 07-05-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Ramkrishna Nagar P.S. Case No. 825 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 25(1-b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. 3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that from a room, one country-made pistol, one foreign made pistol and 20 live cartridges were recovered. 4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. He also submits that the room from where recovery has been made does not belong to the petitioner. Nothing has been recovered from the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29857 of 2026(2) dt.07-05-2026 2/2 possession of this petitioner. The witnesses of the seizure list are police personnel, and the police has not complied with Section 105 of the BNSS while making the seizure. Moreover, the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 29.09.2025. 5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State and submits that the petitioner has criminal antecedent of eight cases. 6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail with the condition that the petitioner shall cooperate in trial, shall remain physically present on each and every date fixed by the learned court below and one of the bailors shall be his near relative. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs.
ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Patna in connection with Ramkrishna Nagar P.S. Case No. 825 of 2025. Sudhanshu/- (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) U T