( 2026:JHHC:16927 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 4307 of 2026 Alok Poul @ Alok Pal, Son of Ganesh Pal … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opp. Party --- CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Saurav Kumar, Advocate For the Opp. Party : None --- 05/11.06.2026 Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody in connection with Cyber P.S. Case No. 77 of 2022, for the offences registered under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468,471,120(B) of IPC and Section 66(B), 66(C), 66(D) and Section 84(C) of the Information Technology Act, 2000, pending in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II-cum-Spl. Judge Cyber Crime Cases, Deoghar. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 14.10.2025. Charge sheet has been submitted on 09.01.2026 and charge has been framed on 25.02.2026. He further submits that trial has commenced but on two occasions, none of the prosecution witness has come before the court. The learned counsel has submitted that similarly situated co-accused namely Aajad Das and Bishnu Ravidas have been granted bail by co-ordinate Benches of this court in B.A. No. 4698 of 2026 and in B.A. No. 1534 of 2026 respectively. 4. As per the impugned order itself it has been recorded from the memo of evidence that an amount of Rs. 90,000/- has been transferred from the bank account of the informant to the IDFC bank account no. 10099878792 of the petitioner. It is not the case of the petitioner that the bank account mentioned in the impugned order does not belong to the petitioner and the petitioner has no explanation regarding this fact. 5. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances in connection with the cyber fraud alleged to have been committed, this court is not ( 2026:JHHC:16927 ) 2 inclined to enlarge the petitioner above named on bail. Accordingly, prayer for bail of the petitioner above named is rejected at this stage. The petitioner may renew his prayer for bail after 3 months. 6. Let this order be communicated to the court concerned through FAX/e-mail. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Dated: 11.06.2026 Uploaded on 12.06.2026 Binit/