Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16192 (AP)

NAMANA KRISHNA MOHAN RAO v. G. SAI PRASAD, IAS

CC/456/2026 · 2026-03-12

Nyapathy Vijay

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010054392026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3460] FRIDAY,THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY CONTEMPT CASE NO: 456/2026 Between: 1. NAMANA KRISHNA MOHAN RAO, S/O. VENKATESWARLU, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, OCC SENIOR ASSISTANT SRO AMMANABROLU FAC SUB-REGISTRAR, GIDDALUR R/O. D. NO. 8-11-33, MUNISEF VARI STREET, PERALA, CHIRALA, BAPATLA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. G SAI PRASAD IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. SRI DR B R AMBEDKAR IAS, COMMISSIONER AND INSPECTOR GENERAL, REGISTRATION AND STAMPS, VIJAYAWADA, ANDHRA PRADESH 3. SRI P RAJA BABU IAS, DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PRAKASAM DISTRICT AT ONGOLE 4. SRI M MUNI SANKARAIAH, DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF REGISTRATION AND STAMPS PRAKASAM DISTRICT, AT ONGOLE 5. SRI ALLA BALA ANJANEYULU, DISTRICT REGISTRAR PRAKASAM DISTRICT AT ONGOLE ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondents under section 10 to 12 of contempt of court act, 1971 for their willful disobedience to the order dated 30.10.2025 passed in IA No. 2 of 2025 in W.P. No. 29751 of 2025 in the interest of justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. UDAY KUMAR VAMPUGADAVALA Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. G RAJU 2. N SIVA REDDY 2 The Court made the following: 3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY Contempt Case No.456 of 2026 ORDER: 1. The present Contempt Case is filed for non-compliance of the Interim Order, dated 30.10.2025 passed by this Court in I.A.No.02 of 2025 in W.P.No.29751 of 2025, wherein this Court had passed an interim order directing the Respondents to examine the necessity and extension of orders of suspension of the Petitioner in terms of G.O.Ms.No.22 (General Administration (Ser.C) Department), dated 29.02.2024 and in the light of the Judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Ajay Kumar Choudhary vs. Union of India and Another1, within a period of four (04) weeks. 2. Sri G. Raju, learned counsel appears for Respondent No.3. 3. Sri N. Siva Reddy, learned counsel for Respondent Nos.2, 4 and 5 passed on written instructions issued vide Memo.No.REV01- REGSOCIRV(ACBC)/18/2025-VIG-II, dated 25.02.2026, wherein the case of the Petitioner was examined and a decision was taken to continue the suspension of the Petitioner, until further orders. 4. In that view, the Contempt Case is closed, leaving it open to the Petitioner to challenge the correctness of the orders referred above. 1 (2015) 7 SCC 291 4 5. No order as to costs. 6. As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. Written Instructions are placed on record. __________________ NYAPATHY VIJAY, J Date: 13.03.2026 chs 5 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY 110 Contempt Case No.456 of 2026 Date: 13.03.2026 chs