[2026:RJ-JP:8270] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 295/2026 1. Anshu Tiwari D/o Pawan Kumar Tiwari, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Pipari Majha, Gonda Pipari Majha Uttar Pradesh, Presently Residing At Munka Jorda, Raghunathpura, Ward No. 13, Police Station Gudhagorji, District Jhunjhunu. 2. Shivam Singh S/o Pravesh Singh, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Chikhadi Chaatouni, P.o. Chikkari Dhandhar, Sitapur, Uttar Pradesh, Presently Residing At Munka Jorda, Raghunathpura, Ward No. 13, Police Station Gudhagorji, District Jhunjhunu. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. 2. The Director General Of Police, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 3. The Superintendent Of Police, Jhunjhunu. 4. The Station House Officer, Gudhagorji, District Jhunjhunu. 5. Pawan Kumar Tiwari S/o Unknown, R/o Pipari Majha, Gonda Pipari Majha Uttar Pradesh ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mukesh Kumar Saini For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Choudhary, Dy.G.A. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL Order 23/02/2026 1. Defects pointed out by the Registry are overruled. 2. This criminal writ petition has been filed by petitioners seeking protection from the private respondent No.5 as they are apprehending danger to their life and liberty at the hands of private respondent. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that both the petitioners are major to take decision of their life. He submits that [2026:RJ-JP:8270] (2 of 2) [CRLW-295/2026] petitioners solemnized their marriage on 06.02.2026 at Arya Samaj Sansthan, Lal Kothi, Tonk Road, Jaipur and same has been registered before the Marriage Registration Officer, Nagar Nigam Jaipur. A copy of the petitioners’ marriage registration certificate has been annexed with the petition. Counsel further submits that petitioners are living peacefully as husband and wife but respondent No.5 is not happy with their marriage and petitioners are receiving continuous threats from the private respondent, so they prayed for protection. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners has placed reliance upon the judgment passed by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Lata Singh Vs. State of U.P. reported in AIR 2006 SC 2522. 5. Learned Dy. Government Advocate has opposed the same. 6. Both the petitioners are present in person today in the court. Their signatures have been obtained on the court’s order sheet and they have been duly identified by their counsel. 7. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioners are directed to file an appropriate application seeking protection before the concerned SHO, who in turn, is directed that if such an application is filed before him, he will provide adequate protection to the petitioners as per law and ensure that no harm is caused to them. 8. The Criminal Writ Petition is, accordingly, disposed of. 9. All pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. 10. However, it is made clear that this order will not affect other civil/ criminal proceedings, if any pending in the present matter. (BHUWAN GOYAL),J RITU/223