Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16187 (AP)

JOGI YESEPH ALIAS CHINNA ALIAS YESURAJU v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

CRLRC/114/2026 · 2026-02-02

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010051562026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 114/2026 Between: 1. JOGI YESEPH ALIAS CHINNA ALIAS YESURAJU, S/O. YAHOSHUVA, AGED 45 YEARS, CAST BY SC MALA, R/O. H.NO. 9-12-20, HARIS PETA, BEHIND PETROL BUNK, CHIRALA TOWN, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH - 523157. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATHI FOR THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH. RESPONDENT 2. KANCHARLA PYDIRAJU, W/O. VANKTA RAO, AGED 66 YEARS. CAST BY VYSYA, PAPARAJUTHOTA, CHIRALA TOWN, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Revision Case, the High Court may be pleased to call for entire records connected to Order dt. 08.12.2025 passed in CrI.MP No. 748 of 2025 in P.R.C No. 3 of 2025 on the file of the Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate, Chirala, examine the same and set aside the order and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 2 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to order stay of all further proceedings including execution of Non Bailable Warrant issued on 13.11.2025 as against the petitioner/2nd Accused in CrI.M.P No. 748 of 2025 in P.R.C. No. 3 of 2025 on the file of the court of learned Addl. Judicial Civil Judge, Chirala, pending disposal of the main Criminal Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. PANGA SIVANARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 114/2026 JUDGMENT: The present Criminal Revision Case has been filed by the State, challenging the Order dated 08.12.2025 in Crl.M.P.No.748 of 2025 in PRC.No.3 of 2025 passed by the learned Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate, Chirala. 2. Heard Sri Panga Sivanarayana, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mrs.K.Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor on behalf of the State. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner herein is Accused No.2, who is facing allegations for the offences punishable under Sections 302 r/w 34 of IPC and when the matter was before the learned Magistrate Court in P.R.C.No.3 of 2025, the petitioner could not appear before the Court on 31.10.2025, when the matter is coming up for production of sureties for committing the matter to the Sessions Division. Learned counsel for the petitioner would further submit that the petitioner was suffering from severe cardiac issues, he was admitted in the Hospital a week prior to 31.10.2025. He would further submit that the absence of the petitioner before the Court is not deliberate or intentional, an opportunity may be given to him to produce sureties before the Court to ensure his presence for the sake of trial. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner was 4 released on regular bail and he is ready to furnish sureties to the satisfaction of the Court. 4. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor would submit that the Court may pass appropriate Orders. 5. Considering the submissions made and on perusal of the material on record, the petitioner preferred an application before the Court to recall the non-bailable warrant issued against him and it is not that the police have produced the petitioner before the Court, since he jumped the bail. In that view of the matter, as the petitioner was released on regular bail and due to medical reasons, he could not appear before the Court on 31.10.2025 for production of sureties, it is apposite to dispose of the present case with the following conditions; i. The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate Court and execute a personal bond for Rs.20,000/- with two sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the concerned Magistrate Court. ii. The petitioner shall appear before the Station House Officer concerned, once in a week i.e., on every Saturday between 10:00 AM and 05:00 PM, till he receives summons from the Sessions Division. 6. Accordingly, this Criminal Revision Case is disposed of. 5 Consequently, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________________ DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 03.02.2026. UPS 6 28 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 114/2026 Dt.03.02.2026 UPS