Research › Search › Judgment
High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body
2026 DAILYLAW 16185 (PNJ)
AMIT ALIAS KALI v. STATE OF HARYANA
CRM-M/80/2026 · 2026-04-09
Rajesh Bhardwaj
body2026
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16185 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16185 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
!" !# !$!! ! !#! %
!&'( ) *+' %%%%%('(',-. /.0 1(( ,2 .3- %%%%% 4,-5-( %
,6'( 7. %%%%%('(',-. /.0 1(( ,2 .3- %%%%% 4,-5-( %
3-8 %%%%%('(',-. /.0 1(( ,2 .3- %%%%% 4,-5-( #( ,2 5'',- 9 :%
% ! 9 ;"< % 1! 1 "!#=! ! "!"#$
%
&'() "!"#$
*
#+#! "!"#$ ,-$
./01 ! 1 "!#=! > % .+ & 2%,-, -,34 POOJA SHARMA 2026.04.10 15:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
" --
% , - --,
345&!6
""!""!"''!"')7(!#,4"(& 2$$,
"!&"&"7&"! 2,4$ &!0 ' -,,--34 ,-54%
"&!""!"'
% %
6)( - % % % - 4 %%8%- %,- ,/,%,4 %%-% %1% %9% %8 4 % -: %/8, ., 1-0%%, ,8%-%8 -,8; , 34 < -,-=
! "!"#$
5
&'() "!"#$ 8
#+#! "!"#$,-%"#!""!"' -->0 POOJA SHARMA 2026.04.10 15:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
-,,
% , % ,
? &&! "!"(&#&""!"("!!6"!"(- -
,-,,
% ,,,-- ) ?,- -
,,-- 4
8 -
"&!""!"'
6)(-4
34- %,,5% % %-4 -%,,%@
, A (--,-4 -34, %
,,
%- %-
,,, 4
% - -- , - ---
,, %- %
- - -4
,,
4
%@ -
,!' , ( ?,- 5 POOJA SHARMA 2026.04.10 15:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
- -?,- 8
# 4
,, - + -
% , ,, , 8
1 ,A0
, ,,- 8
? -- ,- ,-
% -,,%-B ,-, 4
% ,,,,- - = 4 %
%, ---
1 ,)6-%&!% @,1-,, - 6 ;,-- -,34-%,, %@
, % @ A ( -- , -.-
- POOJA SHARMA 2026.04.10 15:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
4 , % , , - : , - ,-,,,!' 4,,- !( %!"
!"
C
5 8 %- 8
4 --%@5 ,,- &! .,%
, ,--, -
,
11. The Hon’ble Supreme Court in Ashim @ Asim Kumar Haranath Bhattacharya @ Asim Harinath Bhattacharya @ Aseem Kumar Bhattacharya Vs. National Investigation Agency, 2022(1) SCC 695 has held as under:
“Deprivation of personal liberty without ensuring speedy trial is not consistent with Article 21 of the Constitution of India. While deprivation of personal liberty for some period may not be avoidable, period of deprivation pending trial/appeal cannot be unduly long.
At the same time, timely delivery of justice is part of human rights and denial of speedy justice is a threat to public confidence in the administration of justice.” &" . 1:
- !'!+"!")? /5 0+& @' 16'86 A% 1(( ,2 6.6(.> .'&'-+ !44+ ,% ,2
B% - ,4 POOJA SHARMA 2026.04.10 15:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
&' This Court would refrain itself from commenting anything on the merits of the case. Thus, k- % , ,,- ,-8,, -% ,
D
,, . D< 5 @-,-, &) 4
,
-
5-,!+, ,-,%8%
-
:%
%
! 1 "!#=! # A-8D
ED5 A-
ED5 POOJA SHARMA 2026.04.10 15:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document