Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16178 (JHR)

GAJO MANDAL v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

WPC/2676/2025 · 2026-06-09

Sri Ananda Sen

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:16579 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 3750 of 2019 1. Kameshwar Choudhary, S/o Ketku Choudhari, R/o Village-Babhandewa, Thana-Chandan, P.O.-Chandan, P.S.-Chandan, Dist.-Deoghar, Jharkhand 2. Arjun Choudhari, S/o Haldhar Choudhari 3. Balram Pd. Yadav, S/o Ishwar Mahto 4. (a)Ranjit Mandal, S/o Akleshwar Mandal @ Budhu Mandal, R/o House No. 14, Village-Hathiyara, P.O.-Rohini, P.S.-Jasidih, Dist.-Deoghar, Jharkhand (b) Rabindra Mandal, S/o Akleshwar Mandal @ Budhu Mandal, R/o House No. 14, Village-Hathiyara, P.O.-Rohini, P.S.-Jasidih, Dist.-Deoghar, Jharkhand 5. Sachita Mandal, S/o Late Rameshwar Mandal 6. Basu Deo, S/o Ritu Mandal, 2 to 6 are R/o Village- Village-Hathiyara, P.O.- Rohini, P.S.-Jasidih, Dist.-Deoghar, Jharkhand 7(a). Binay Kumar Verma, S/o Late Dineshwar Mandal, R/o House No. 14, Gopidih Rohini, P.O.-Rohini, P.S.-Jasidih, Dist.-Deoghar 8. Bhola Chodhri, S/o Musahab Chodhri, R/o Village-Hatiyara, P.O.-Rohini, P.S.-Jasidih, Dist.-Deoghar, Jharkhand 9. Motilal Manjhi, S/o Late Jagdih Manjhi, R/o House No. 05 Lohri, P.O.- Bhojpur, P.S.-Devipur, Dist.-Deoghar 10.Jagdev Kamti S/o Govind Kamti, resident of village-Hathiyara, P.O.- Rohini, P.S. Jasidih, District - Deoghar, Jharkhand. 11. Tripurari Mahato S/o Maleshwar Mahato, resident of village-Hathiyara, P.O.-Rohini, P.S. Jharkhand. Jasidih, District Deoghar 12. Suresh Kapri S/o Amin Kapri, resident of village-Gopidih, P.O.-Rohini, P.S-Jasidih, District - Deoghar. 13. Santlal S/o Asraf Mandal, resident of village-Hathiyara, P.O.-Rohini, P.S. Jasidih, District - Deoghar, Jharkhand. 14. Banku Mandal S/o-Late Fuleshwar Mandal, resident of Daulatpur, P.O. & P.S.-Deoghar, District- Deoghar. 15. Ramesh Mandal S/o Bodan Mandal, resident of village-Hathiyara, P.O.- Rohini, P.S. Jasidih, District - Deoghar, Jharkhand. 16. Shiv Prasad Mahato S/o Shalo Mahato, resident of village-Hathiyara, P.O.-Rohini, P.S. Jharkhand. Jasidih, District Deoghar. 17. Congres Kapri S/o Bhagal Kapri, resident of village-Hathiyara, P.O.- Rohini, P.S. Jasidih, District - Deoghar, Jharkhand. 18. Bhola Mahato S/o Late Tulsi Mahato, resident of house no.38, suthaniya, P.O. & P.S.-Deoghar, Jharkhand. 19. Ganesh Mahto S/o late Nand Kishor Mahto, resident of House no.2, Lalpur, P.O. & P.S. -Deoghar, Jharkhand. .... Petitioner(s). Versus 1. State of Jharkhand 2. The Secretary, Department of Land & Revenue, Project Building, P.O. & P.S.-Dhurwa, District-Ranchi, Jharkhand. 3. The Deputy Commissioner, Deoghar, P.O. & P.S.-Deoghar, District- Deoghar. 4. The SDM, Deoghar, P.O. & P.S.-Deoghar, District Deoghar, Jharkhand. 5. The Circle Officer, Devipur P.O. & P.S.-Devipur, District - Deoghar, Jharkhand. 6. The Officer-in-charge, P.O. & P.S.-Devipur, District Deoghar, Jharkhand. 7. Lakhan Singh 8. Shankar Singh 9. Sanjay Singh, Respondent Nos. 7 to 9 S/o Late Singheshwar Singh 10. (Died Issuless) 11. Onkar Singh, S/o Late Chandra Moli Singh 12. (i) Dulari Devi, W/o Late Angroj Singh (ii)Dashrath Singh, S/o Late Angroj Singh (iii)Pandav Singh, S/o Late Angroj Singh (iv)Dani Singh, S/o Late Angroj Singh (v)Ram Balak Singh, S/o Late Angroj Singh (vi)Bani Singh, S/o Late Angroj Singh (vii) Kulo Singh, S/o Late Angroj Singh, All are R/o Village-Kokhara, P.O. & P.S.-Devipur, Dist.-Deoghar 13. Sahdev Singh, M/o Late Rameshwari Devi, R/o Village-Kokhara, P.O. & P.S.-Devipur, Dist.-Deoghar 14. (i) Sanshul Mian, S/o Late Feku Mian, Village-Chota Rajasar, P.O.- Bhojpur, P.S.-Devipur, Dist.-Deoghar, Jharkhand 15. (Died issueless) 16. (i) Azad Mian (ii) Mubarak Mian (iii) Kutus Mian (iv) Mirzamuddin Mian, All S/o Late Nahel Mian, R/o Village-Chota Rajasar, P.O.-Bhojpur, P.S.-Devipur, Dist.-Deoghar, Jharkhand 17. (Died Issueless) 18. Basuruddin Mian, S/o Late Asgar Mian 19. Kamruddin Ansari, S/o Late Ketku Mian 20. Safruddin Mian, S/o Late Ketku Mian 21. (i) Chandar Mahto (ii) Ghanshyam Mahto, Both S/o Jitu Mahto, R/o Village-Chota Rajasar, P.O.-Bhojpur, P.S.-Devipur, Dist.-Deoghar, Jharkhand 22. (i) Chaudhary Mahto (ii) Laxman Mahto (iii) Nakul Mahto, All S/o Late Mittan Mahto, R/o Village-Chota Rajasar P.O.-Bhojpur, P.S.-Devipur, Dist.-Deoghar, Jharkhand 23. Kisan Manjhi 24. Jiblal Mahto, Respondent Nos. 18 to 20, 23 & 24 are R/o Village-Chota Rajasar, P.O.-Bhojpur, P.S.-Devipur, Dist.-Deoghar, Jharkhand. . … Respondent(s) With W.P.(C) No. 2676 of 2025 Gajo Mandal, S/o Late Udeshwar Mandal, R/o House No. 14, Basmandih, P.O. & P.S.-Jasidih, Dist.-Deoghar .... Petitioner(s). Versus 1. State of Jharkhand 2. The Secretary, Department of Land & Revenue, Project Building, P.O. & P.S.- Dhurwa, District-Ranchi, Jharkhand 3. The Deputy Commissioner, Deoghar, P.O. & P.S.-Deoghar, District- Deoghar. 4. The SDM, Deoghar, P.O. & P.S.-Deoghar, District Deoghar, Jharkhand. 5. The Circle Officer, Devipur P.O. & P.S.-Devipur, District - Deoghar, Jharkhand. 6. The Officer-in-charge, Devipur P.O. & P.S.-Devipur, District Deoghar, Jharkhand. . … Respondent(s) ------ CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s): Mr. Niranjan Kumar, Advocate. For the State Ms. Shalini Shahdeo, AC to SC (L&C)-I Mr. Amrit Raj Kisku, AC To GA-V For the Respondents Mr. D.K. Chakravorty, Advocate ------ 20/09.06.2026 Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2. The counsel for the petitioners submits that the land belongs to the petitioners and they are in possession but the private respondents are disturbing their possession over the land in question and are creating hindrance. 3. The private respondents submits that the land has been settled in their favour by Bhoodan Yag Committee and they are also claiming title over the land in question. 4. Thus, from the arguments of the parties, it is quite clear that there is title dispute between the parties, which cannot be decided in these applications filed under Article 226 of the Constitution. Further the prayer of the petitioners injuncting the respondents from disturbing their peaceful possession of the petitioners also cannot be passed in these applications filed under Article 226 of the Constitution. 5. For the reliefs claimed by the petitioners and also for the adjudication of the title, the petitioners should approach the civil court of competent jurisdiction. 6. With the aforesaid observations, these petitions stand disposed of. (ANANDA SEN, J.) 09th June, 2026 Anu/-