Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16177 (CHH)

GIRISH CHANDRA MISHRA v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/1216/2026 · 2026-02-01

Shri Parth Prateem Sahu

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:5678 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 1216 of 2026 1 - Girish Chandra Mishra S/o Late K. D. Mishra Aged About 58 Years Occupation- Service, Presently Posted As Principal, Government Girls Higher Secondary School, Rajpur, District- Balrampur-Ramanujganj, C.G. ... Petitioner Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, School Education, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar Naya Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - The Director Lok Shikshan Sanchalnalaya, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - The Commissioner Sarguja Division, Ambikapur, District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh 4 - The Collector Cum President Swami Atma Nand Utriksth (Angreji Madhyam), Vidyalaya, District- Balrampur-Ramanujganj, C.G. 5 - The Chief Executive Officer Zila Panchayat, Balrampur, District- Balrampur- Ramanujganj, C.G. 6 - The District Education Officer District- Balrampur-Ramanujganj, C.G. 7 - The District Treasury Officer District- Balrampur-Ramanujganj, C.G. ... Respondents For Petitioner : Ms. Kusum Lalchandani, Advocate For Respondents/State : Ms. Deeksha Gouraha, Dy. Government Advocate SB: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge ORDER ON BOARD 2 02/02 /2026 1. The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking following reliefs:- “10.1 That this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the entire record pertaining to the present case. 10.2 That this Hon'ble Court may please to quash / set-aside impugned order dated 08.12.2025 (Ann P- 1 with regard to petitioner is concern, Sl. No. 01), issued by the Respondent No.04 and allow him to get the salary as has been disbursed to prior to issuance of the order impugned, in the interest of justice. 10.3 That this Hon'ble Court may please to issue appropriate orders / writs / directions thereby the Respondent authorities be directed to decide the representation dated 24.12.2025 submitted by the Petitioner, within stipulated period, in the interest of justice. 10.4 That this Hon'ble court may further be pleased to pass any other order in favor of petitioner as it may deem fit and proper under the facts and circumstances of the case with cost.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that she is not pressing this writ petition on merits and is only seeking a direction to the Respondent No. 6 to take decision on the pending representation dated 24.12.2025 (Annexure P/2) at the earliest within specified time frame. 3. On the other hand, learned counsel for the Respondents/State submits that as the petitioner is not pressing this writ petition on merits, but is only seeking a direction to the Respondent No. 6 to consider and decide the representation submitted by the petitioner, she is having no objection. If the representation is still pending consideration, it will be considered and appropriate orders would be passed in accordance with law. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the documents enclosed along with the writ petition. 5. On due consideration of the submission of counsel for the respective parties, facts and circumstances of the case, nature of grievance raised 3 by the petitioner, this writ petition at this stage is disposed of directing the Respondent No. 6 to consider and take decision on the representation dated 24.12.2025 (Annexure P/2) submitted by the petitioner in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a further period of 03 months from the date of receipt of the order. 6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, this writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Dey SHUBHAM DEY Digitally signed by SHUBHAM DEY Date: 2026.02.04 11:38:18 +0530