VINAYAK SHIVRAM INGALE v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRU. A) THE DIRECTOR, BDD CHAWL, B) THE MANAGER, BDD CHAWL
WP/2874/2023 · 2026-10-07
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16167 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16167 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
3-wp.2874.2023.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2874 OF 2023 Vinayak Shivram Ingale … Petitioner Versus State of Maharashtra and Anr.
...Respondents Mr. Sushil Chaurasia i/b SKC Legal for the Petitioner. Ms. Anjali Helekar, G.P. with Mr. Manish Upadhye, A.G.P. for the Respondents-State.
CORAM: BHARATI DANGRE &
ASHISH S. CHAVAN, JJ.
DATE : 7th OCTOBER 2026 P.C. :
1. In the wake of the affidavit-in-reply filed by the State, reflecting that the Tenancy which the petitioner sought to have transferred in his name has further shifted hands, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the Writ Petition, with liberty to institute fresh proceedings challenging the order dated 26th September 2025, whereby the Tenancy was transferred, on the basis of heirship rights, in favour of Mr. Pramod Prakash Ingle and Ms. Kalpana Prakash Ingle. N. S. Chitnis 1/2 NISHA SANDEEP CHITNIS Digitally signed by NISHA SANDEEP CHITNIS Date: 2026.10.08 16:17:54 +0530
3-wp.2874.2023.doc Though the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the said order is non est, in our view, this submission can be tested upon the appropriate proceedings being filed, with the aforesaid persons being impleaded as respondents to the proceedings. The Petition stands disposed of as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed.
ASHISH S. CHAVAN, J.
BHARATI DANGRE, J. N. S. Chitnis 2/2