KRISHNA MALI ALIAS KRISHNA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./4378/2026 · 2026-06-10
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16166 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16166 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2026:JHHC:16714 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 4378 of 2026
------ Krishna Mali @ Krishna, aged about 18 years, son of Sheru, resident of Khurpia Gate, Khurpia, Udham Singh Nagar, P.O.+P.S. –Kichha, District –Udham Singh Nagar, Uttarakhand -263148.
… Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party
------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Birendra Kumar, Advocate For the State
: Mr. Vijoy Kr. Sinha, Addl. P.P. ------
Order No.02 Dated- 10.06.2026
Heard the parties.
The petitioner has moved before this Court for grant of bail in connection with Chutia P.S. Case No. 38 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under sections 112, 317(5), 3(5) of the B.N.S.
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner has committed theft of three mobile phones and also the petitioner is involved with an organized gang of criminals engaged in commission of theft of mobile phones. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 09 of the bail application. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 01.04.2026, as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 07 of the bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the co-accused person has already been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 14.05.2026 in B.A. No. 4147 of 2026. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail.
The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the abovenamed petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ranchi, in connection with Chutia P.S. Case No. 38 of 2026, with the condition that the petitioner will cooperate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and a copy of his Aadhar Card in the court below with the undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.)
10.06.2026
Sonu/