Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16164 (JHR)

DHIRAJ KUMAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./5052/2026 · 2026-06-10

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

{ 2026:JHHC:16719} IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.5052 of 2026 ------ Dhiraj Kumar, aged about 24 years, Sex-Male, S/o Sri Ram Sahu, R/o Village- pipar Toli, belhanthi Road, Datia, P.O. + P.S.- Khunti, Dist.- Khunti, Jharkhand, Aadhar No. 6245 0556 4108. … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand. … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Aman Kumar Rahul, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Subodh Kumar Dubey, A.P.P. ------ Order No:-02 Dated:-10-06-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Khunti P.S. Case No. 37 of 2026 corresponding to G.R. No. 184 of 2026, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 111(2)(b), 308 of the B.N.S., 2023, Section 25(1-B)a, 26, 35 of the Arms Act and Section 17 CLA Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner is an infamous PLFI extremist and was apprehended by police when he came to collect extortion and from the possession of the accused persons of the case, fire-arms were recovered while from the possession of the petitioner, 03 rounds live cartridges and 09 cheques of used amount and PLFI pamphlets were recovered. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is next submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedents as mentioned in para 17 of the bail application. It is next submitted that petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the informant or witnesses of the case. It is further submitted that charge-sheet has already been submitted, none of the witnesses have been examined as yet. It is lastly submitted that petitioner has been in custody since 14.03.2026 as is evident in para 1 of bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM at Khunti in connection with Khunti P.S. Case No. 37 of 2026 corresponding to G.R. No. 184 of 2026 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the informant or witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 10/06/2026 Amar/