Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16163 (RAJ)

BANTI S/O VIJENDRA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/1377/2026 · 2026-01-24

Ganesh Ram Meena

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:3405] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1377/2026 Banti S/o Vijendra, R/o Samantgarh, Police Station Gadi Bajna, District Bharatpur (At Present Confined In District Jail, Dholpur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rambabu, cousin brother of petitioner For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sudesh Saini, P.P. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 24/01/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 on behalf of accused-petitioner in connection with FIR No. 99/2021 registered at Police Station Nadanpur, District Dholpur for offences under Sections 384, 395 and 457 of I.P.C. 2. It is submitted on behalf of the accused-petitioner that accused-petitioner was initially enlarged on bail in the main criminal case. The accused-petitioner has gone for earning his livelihood, therefore, he could not appear before the learned Trial Court on 06.03.2025 and therefore his bail bonds and sureties were forfeited. It is also submitted that the accused-petitioner has been arrested on 12.01.2026 and the accused-petitioner will remain present before the learned Trial Court on each and every date in future. [2026:RJ-JP:3405] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-1377/2026] 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail application. 4. Taking into consideration that fact that the accused- petitioner was initially enlarged on bail in the main criminal case, however because he was gone to earn his livelihood, he could not appear before the learned Trail Court on 06.03.2025, and his bail bonds and sureties were forfeited and also the fact that he is in custody since 12.01.2026, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits or demerits of the case deems just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 5. Accordingly, this bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner named above shall be enlarged on bail provided, he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- together with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for their appearance before the Court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J SHRUTI SHARMA /221