IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26848 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-300 Year-2025 Thana- NAUTAN District- West Champaran ====================================================== Laxminiya Devi @ Lakshminiya Devi W/o Sri Aklu Chaudhary Resident of village - Khadda Kujlahi, P.S - Nautan, District - West Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sharad Kumar Verma, Adv For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Ajit Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 2 13-05-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 61(2), 109, 351(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and later on Section 103(1) of the BNS was added. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and is in custody since 7-2-2026. It is next submitted that petitioner had earlier moved before this Court seeking anticipatory bail by filing Cr. Misc No. 69924 of 2025 and the same came to be rejected by an order dated 14-10-2025 after considering the case on merits and in detail. It is further submitted that from perusal of the allegations as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26848 of 2026(2) dt.13-05-2026 2/3 petitioner is not alleged to have stabbed the informant and her three years old child rather specific allegation of stabbing the injured is against Jagan. It is also submitted that petitioner being mother of Jagan came to be implicated. It is next submitted that if privilege of regular bail is granted to the petitioner, the petitioner will not abscond rather will co-operate in the trial to prove her innocence. 4. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. 5. Considering the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Nautan P.S. Case No. 300 of 2025. 6. One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be her son- in-law, Ashok Sahni. 7. However, it is made clear that if the learned trial court comes to a conclusion that the petitioner after her release is trying to delay the framing of charge or after framing of charge is delaying the trial in any manner, the learned trial court Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26848 of 2026(2) dt.13-05-2026 3/3 shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner. Sumit/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T