SUCHAN BHUIYAN @ SUCHAN KUMAR @ MALINGA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./4283/2026 · 2026-06-10
Anubha Rawat Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16159 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16159 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2026:JHHC:16739 )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 4283 of 2026
Suchan Bhuiyan @ Suchan Kumar
@ Malinga, Son of Mushan Bhuiyan … … Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
…
… Opp. Party ---
CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY ---
For the Petitioner : Mr. Sudhanshu Shekhar, Advocate
For the Opp. Party : Mr. Someshwar Roy, A.P.P.
---
05/10.06.2026 Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody in connection with Tarhasi P.S. Case No. 118 of 2025, for the offences registered under Sections 96, 3(5) of the B.N.S. 2023 (Corresponding to Section 366A, 34 of IPC), pending in the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Palamau.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is 19 years of age and is in custody since 01.01.2026. As per the FIR and also the impugned order, which also refers to the statement of the victim recorded under Section 183 of the BNSS, there was love affair between the petitioner and the victim and the victim eloped with the petitioner and ultimately, she was recovered. The learned counsel submits that charge sheet has been submitted and the petitioner be enlarged on bail.
4.
Learned counsel for the opposite party-State has opposed the prayer for bail by submitting that the victim is a minor but has not disputed the fact about love affair with the victim which is reflected from the FIR and also from the impugned order.
5. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances and the fact that charge sheet having been submitted, the petitioner above named is
directed to be enlarged on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty-five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate,
( 2026:JHHC:16739 ) 2
Palamau in connection with Tarhasi P.S. Case No. 118 of 2025, on the following conditions: (i) The petitioner shall not disturb the victim in any manner. (ii) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (iii) The other bailor should be his close relative. (iv) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of his single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (v) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (vi) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned court below.
6. Let this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through FAX/e- mail.
7. The instant bail application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions.
(Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Dated: 10.06.2026 Uploaded on 11.06.2026 Binit/