Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16159 (BOM)

PAREKH CORPORATION v. Quikr India Private Limited

CARBP/1073/2026 · 2026-10-07

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1/2 12 CARBP-1073-2026.DOC IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION IN ITS COMMERCIAL DIVISION COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 1073 OF 2026 Parekh Corporation … Petitioner Vs. Quikr India Private Limited … Respondent _______ Mr. Manee Vishwakarma and Mr. Jerome Stephen i/b Vinod Mistry and Co. for Petitioner. _______ CORAM : ARIF S. DOCTOR, J. DATE : 7 TH OCTOBER, 2026. P.C. 1. The present Petition has been filed under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and seeks extension of mandate of Arbitral Tribunal to complete the arbitration proceedings and publish its Award. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner has placed reliance on Affidavit of service to prove that Respondent has been served. Furthermore, he submits that arguments in arbitration proceedings have been concluded and all that remains is for the Tribunal to publish its Award. Sairaj SAIRAJ SANJAY KARANDE Digitally signed by SAIRAJ SANJAY KARANDE Date: 2026.10.08 11:34:05 +0530 2/2 12 CARBP-1073-2026.DOC 3. Accordingly, Petition is allowed. 4. Time is extended for a period of one month from the date on which the copy of this order is uploaded on the website. (ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.) Sairaj