Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16156 (RAJ)

RASHEED S/O ISLAMUDDIN v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/1216/2026 · 2026-01-27

Praveer Bhatnagar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:3427] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1216/2026 Rasheed S/o Islamuddin, R/o Fadalpur, Police Station Binoli, District Baghpat (Uttar Pradesh) (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Ajmer). ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Aayush Agarwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 27/01/2026 1. Instant bail application has been preferred under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for grant of regular bail to the petitioner, in a case arising out of First Information Report No.283/2025 registered at Police Station Pushkar District Ajmer for offences punishable under Sections 310 (4), 313 & 111 (3) of B.N.S., 2023. 2. Submissions of learned counsel appearing for the petitioner are that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. It is contended that he has nothing to do with the alleged offence and he is behind the bars since long. In the present case, after investigation, charge-sheet has been filed. The trial of the case is likely to take a long time to conclude, till then, his further incarceration would not serve any fruitful purpose and he is ready & willing to furnish his bail bonds. Therefore, the bail application deserve to be allowed. [2026:RJ-JP:3427] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-1216/2026] 3. Learned Public Prosecutor for the State has vehemently opposed the bail application. 4. Heard learned counsel appearing for the accused-petitioner as well as the learned Public Prosecutor for the State and perused the material made available on record. 5. Considering the overall facts & circumstances of the case and the submissions made at bar but without commenting upon detailed merits of the case, this Court deems it proper to enlarge the petitioner on regular application. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 of B.N.S.S., 2023 is allowed and it is, hereby, ordered that the accused petitioner Rasheed S/o Islamuddin, shall be enlarged on bail, if he is not required in any other case, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rs. Fifty Thousand Only) with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the ld. trial Judge for his appearance before the Court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. The learned trial Judge shall also verify the address and the contact details of the surety through concerned SHO before releasing the accused-petitioner on bail. 8. The accused-petitioner is also directed to mark his presence on 25th of every month till conclusion of trial before the concerned police station. The SHO of the concerned police station is directed to maintain a regular register marking the presence of the accused-petitioner and shall send the presence report of the accused-petitioner on the same day to the concerned Trial Court without any delay. In case of any breach to the aforementioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the [2026:RJ-JP:3427] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-1216/2026] application against the accused-petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. 9. The accused-petitioner is also directed to submit his present address along with the mobile number to the concerned SHO within a period of 7 days from his release and the concerned SHO shall verify the said address and the mobile number. In case if the petitioner changes his address or mobile number, he shall submit the same before the concerned SHO so also before the concerned learned Trial Court. 10. A copy of this order shall be sent to the concerned SHO for its strict compliance. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Keshav/Rashmi/4