APHC010049882026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] THURSDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 3326/2026 Between: VASIREDDY NARASIMHA RAO, S/O. V. GOPALA KRISHNAIAH, AGED 73 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, RIO. H.NO.2-21, KODAVATIKALLU VILLAGE, CHANDARLAPADU MANDAL, NANDIGAMA TALUQ, N.T.R. KRISHNA DISTRICT-521182. ....PETITIONER ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT-522238. 2. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, N.T.R. KRISHNA DISTRICT- 521001. 3. 3. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NANDIGAMA CIRCLE, NANDIGAMA TOWN, N.T.R. KRISHNA DISTRICT-521185. 4. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, CHANDARLAPADU PS, NANDIGAMA, N.T.R. KRISHNA DISTRICT-521182. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: CHALLA SIVASANKAR 2 Counsel for the Respondent(S): GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: The Writ Petition has been filed for the following relief: “…to issue a Writ, order or directions, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents 2 to 4 in not taking action on petitioner's report dated.19-12-2025 (served on 22- 12-2025), against the persons who played fraud on the petitioner and created bogus and fabricated documents with regard to his house bearing No.2-21 situated at Kodavatikalli Village, Chandarlapadu Mandal, Nandigama Taluk, NTR Krishna District in collusion with Bank Officials and Sub-Registrar, Kanchikacherla and created the right over petitioner's house property and obtained loans by executing mortgage deed in favour of Banks which is illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and contrary to the Articles 14 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents 2 to 4 to consider petitioner's report dated.19-12-2025 (served on 22- 12-2025) and take appropriate action against the persons who played fraud on the petitioner and created bogus and fabricated documents with regard to the subject house…” 2. Heard the learned counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader. 3. Sri Challa Siva Sankar, the learned counsel for the Petitioner, submits that the report submitted by the Petitioner on 19.12.2025, which was served on Respondent Nos.2 to 4 on 22.12.2025, has not been acted upon in the manner in which it ought to have been responded to. 4. Sri Ajay Babu, the learned Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, submits that the police have undertaken the exercise of conducting a preliminary enquiry as contemplated under Section 173(3) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. 3 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the Respondent Nos.2 to 4 to dispose of the representation dated 19.12.2025 made by the Petitioner, within two months, keeping in view of the fact that the Petitioner is a peasant aged about 73 years and a senior citizen of this State. 6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. ________________________ Dr. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Date: 05.02.2026 PRA 4 35 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO WRIT PETITION No.3326 of 2026 Date: 05.02.2026 PRA