Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1615 (PNJ)

NARINDER KUMAR AND OTHERS v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHES

INCOMP/904/2026 · 2026-04-16

Manisha Batra

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

132 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT NARINDER KUMAR AND OTHERS STATE OF PUNJAB CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Present: None. MANISHA BATRA, J. (ORAL) 1. 2. Haryana High C been raised by the Registry is to be taken back by the counsel/party, who filed it for the purpose of refiling the same within a period of 40 days. However, as per Registry, the present case has removing objection(s) despite lapse of aforesaid period. In view thereof, the present case is dismissed in default, with liberty to file it afresh after removing the objection(s) so raised by the Registry. 16.04.2026 Amit Sharma IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH NARINDER KUMAR AND OTHERS Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Present: None. **** MANISHA BATRA, J. (ORAL) There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. As per Rule 9, Chapter 1, Part Haryana High Court Rules and Orders, the petition on which objections have been raised by the Registry is to be taken back by the counsel/party, who filed it for the purpose of refiling the same within a period of 40 days. However, as per Registry, the present case has removing objection(s) despite lapse of aforesaid period. In view thereof, the present case is dismissed in default, with liberty to file it afresh after removing the objection(s) so raised by the Registry. Whether speaking/reasoned: Whether reportable:- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH INCOMP-904-2026 Date of decision : 16.04.2026 ... Petitioners ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. As per Rule 9, Chapter 1, Part-A, Volume V of Punjab and ourt Rules and Orders, the petition on which objections have been raised by the Registry is to be taken back by the counsel/party, who filed it for the purpose of refiling the same within a period of 40 days. However, as per Registry, the present case has not been taken back for removing objection(s) despite lapse of aforesaid period. In view thereof, the present case is dismissed in default, with liberty to file it afresh after removing the objection(s) so raised by the Registry. (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No - Yes/No 2026 .2026 A, Volume V of Punjab and ourt Rules and Orders, the petition on which objections have been raised by the Registry is to be taken back by the counsel/party, who filed it for the purpose of refiling the same within a period of 40 days. not been taken back for removing objection(s) despite lapse of aforesaid period. In view thereof, the present case is dismissed in default, with liberty to file it afresh after AMIT SHARMA 2026.04.16 16:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.