JANA SMALL FINANCE BANK LTD v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR GOVT PLEADER AND ORS
WP/10683/2026 · 2026-10-08
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16139 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16139 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
913_WP_10683_26.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 10683 OF 2026 Jana Small Finance Bank Ltd. … Petitioner vs. The State of Maharashtra and others … Respondents WITH INTERIM APPLICATION (STAMP) NO. 29272 OF 2026 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 10683 OF 2026 None for petitioner – secured creditor. Ms. Tanu N. Bhatia, AGP for respondents – State authorities. Mr. Siddharth Ghodke, i/b. Mr. Narayan Rokade for applicant in IA(St)/29272/2026.
CORAM : MANISH PITALE & SHREERAM V. SHIRSAT, JJ DATE :
08th OCTOBER, 2026 P.C. : . In this petition, on 16.09.2026, this Court had passed an order issuing specific directions for the physical possession of the secured asset being taken on 29.09.2026 for being handed over to the petitioner – bank (secured creditor).
2. Today when the petition is called out for consideration, there is no appearance on behalf of the petitioner – bank (secured creditor). But, the learned AGP has instructions to state that the directions have been complied with. Copies of panchanama and taba pavati dated 28.09.2026 are tendered. The same are taken on record. 1/2 PRIYA KAMBLI Digitally signed by PRIYA KAMBLI Date: 2026.10.08 17:56:33 +0530
913_WP_10683_26.doc
3. Respondent No.4 – Police Inspector, Niphad Police Station, is
directed to take urgent steps in respect of the written complaint submitted by the petitioner – bank, in accordance with law.
4. Since the directions issued by this Court have been complied with, no further orders are necessary,
5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. Pending application also stands disposed of.
(SHREERAM V. SHIRSAT, J.) (MANISH PITALE, J.) 2/2 Priya Kambli