MUSKAN BAGADI DAUGHTER OF SHRI HANSRAJ W/O VIKAS AGARWAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLW/113/2026 · 2026-01-22
Anil Kumar Upman
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16137 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16137 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:3108] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 113/2026
1. Muskan Bagadi Daughter Of Shri Hansraj W/o Vikas Agarwal, Aged About 21 Years, Resident Of Plot No. B- 647, Jda Colony, Paldi Meena, Agra Road, Jaipur (Raj.)
2. Vikas Agarwal Son Of Shri Kishan Agarwal, Aged About 24 Years, Resident Of Plot No. B-647, Jda Colony, Paldi Meena, Agra Road, Jaipur (Raj.) ----Petitioners Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
2. The Director General Of Police, Jaipur (Raj.)
3. The Commissioner Of Police, Jaipur (Raj.)
4. The Deputy Commissioner Of Police, Jaipur City- East, Jaipur(Raj.)
5. The Station House Officer, Police Station Jamdoli, District- Jaipur City- East, Jaipur (Raj.)
6. Aasha Devi Wife Of Shri Kishan Agarwal, Resident Of Plot No. B-647, Jda Colony, Paldi Meena, Agra Road, Jaipur (Raj.)
7. Kishan Agarwal Son Of Shri Suraj, Resident Of Plot No. B- 647, Jda Colony, Paldi Meena, Agra Road, Jaipur (Raj.)
8. Uganti Wife Of Shri Hanraj, Resident Of Plot No. B-644, Jda Colony, Paldi Meena, Agra Road, Jaipur (Raj.).
9. Kavita Wife Of Shri Mohan Parewa, Resident Of Plot No. B-644, Jda Colony, Paldi Meena, Agra Road, Jaipur (Raj.).
10. Mohan Parewa Son Shri Hajari Parewa, Resident Of Plot No. B-644, Jda Colony, Paldi Meena, Agra Road, Jaipur (Raj.).
11. Sonu Parewa Son Shri Hajari Parewa, Resident Of Plot No. B-644, Jda Colony, Paldi Meena, Agra Road, Jaipur (Raj.). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Atar Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Punia, PP
[2026:RJ-JP:3108] (2 of 3) [CRLW-113/2026] HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN
Order 22/01/2026
1. Defects pointed out by the Registry are overruled.
2. Petitioners are major and present in person. They have duly been identified by their counsel.
3. This criminal writ petition has been filed by petitioners seeking protection from the private respondent Nos.6 to 11 as they are apprehending danger to their life and liberty at the hands of private respondents.
4.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that both the petitioners are mature enough to take decision of their life. He submits that petitioners have entered into marriage as per Hindu Rites and Customs at Arya Samaj Sansthan, Lal Kothi, Tonk Road, Jaipur on 16.01.2026 and same has been registered on
16.01.2026. The certificate of registration of marriage of the petitioners is annexed with this petition. Counsel further submits that petitioners are living peacefully as husband and wife but respondent Nos.6 to 11 are not happy with their marriage and petitioners are receiving continuous threats from the private respondents, so they prayed for protection.
5. In view of the above factual averments, petitioners are
directed to file appropriate application seeking protection before respondent No.5-Station House Officer, Police Station, Jamdoli, District- Jaipur City East, Jaipur (Raj.) and respondent no.5 is
directed to provide protection to the petitioners, if any application
[2026:RJ-JP:3108] (3 of 3) [CRLW-113/2026] is filed before him and he would ensure that no harm is caused to the petitioners.
6. The criminal writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of.
7. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, stand
disposed of.
8. However, it is made clear that this order will not affect the civil/ criminal proceedings, if any, in the present matter.
(ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J CHARU SONI /245