( 2026:JHHC:16712 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 5000 of 2026 ------ Chiranjit Roy @ Ranjit Ray, aged about 30 years, son of Sri Uttam Roy @ Uttam Kumar Roy, resident of Village Baghmara, P.O. Baghmara, P.S. Baliapur, District –Dhanbad, Jharkhand. … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Ajay Kumar Yadav, Advocate : Mr. Abhishek Kumar Singh, Advocate : Ms. Suman Chatterjee, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rakesh Ranjan, Addl. P.P. ------ Order No.02 Dated- 10.06.2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Baliapur P.S. Case No.58 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under sections 115(2), 195(1), 196, 299, 191(2), 191(3), 190, 121(1), 121(2), 324(5), 109, 132, 118(2), 61(2) of BNS, 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner being the member of an unlawful assembly, in prosecution of the common object of the assembly, armed with deadly weapon, attempted to murder the police personnel and members of the other group. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false and the main allegation is against the Md. Saddam and Md. Mobin of inflicting sword blow upon the officer-in-charge of Baliapur Police Station. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent, as mentioned in paragraph 23 of the bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in jail custody since 31.03.2026, as mentioned in para 25 of this bail application. It is next submitted that a settlement has been arrived at between the parties and in this respect, learned counsel for the petitioner draws attention of the court to Annexure 2 of the Bail Application. It is then submitted that the co-accused person has already been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 12.05.2026 in B.A. No. 4037 of 2026. It is next submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is ready and willing to co-operate with the trial of the case and undertakes not to annoy or disturb the informant or the other witness of the case or victim or their family members in any manner during trial of the case hence, the petitioner may be admitted to bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposed the prayer for bail. Considering submissions of learned counsels and the facts as stated above, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Hence, the court below is directed to release the petitioner on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate -1st Class, Dhanbad in connection with Baliapur P.S. Case No.58 of 2026 with the condition that the petitioner will not annoy or disturb the informant or the other witness of the case or the victim or their family members in any manner during trial of the case and will co- operate with the trial of the case and will furnish mobile phone number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change the mobile phone number during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 10.06.2026 Sonu/