Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:7781 WP No. 29460 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 29460 OF 2023 (KLR-RES)
BETWEEN:
KRISHNAPPA S/O LATE MUNIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, R/AT NO.112/1, 7TH CROSS, 18TH B MAIN ROAD, MARENAHALLI PALAYA, J.P. NAGAR 2ND PHASE, BENGALURU-560 078. …PETITIONER
(BY SRI. RAGHU PRAKASH BABU D., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER BANGALORE SOUTH SUB-DIVISION, K.G. ROAD, KANDAAYA BHAVANA, BENGALURU.
2. TAHSILDHAR BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK, BENGALURU.
3.
3(A) T. NARASIMHAIAH S/O THIMMAIAH @ ANNAYAPPA SINCE DEAD BY LRS.
N.V. SWAMY S/O LATE NARASIMHAIAH, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS,
Digitally signed by LAKSHMI T Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:7781 WP No. 29460 of 2023
3(B) MANJESH S/O LATE NARASIMHAIAH, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS,
4.
N. SHARADAMMA W/O NARASIMHAIAH, AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS,
RESPONDENTS 3(A), 3(B) AND 4 ARE R/AT NO.540, 10TH MAIN 38TH CROSS, JAYANAGARA 5TH BLOCK, BENGALURU-560 041.
5.
N. NARASIMHA MURTHY S/O LATE NAGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS,
6.
MARUTHI PRASAD S/O LATE NAGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS,
7.
M. PUTTAMMA W/O LATE NAGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS,
8.
N. VIJAYALAKSHMI D/O LATE NAGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS
9.
N. SHOBHA D/O LATE NAGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS,
RESPONDENT NOS.5 TO 9 ARE TOGETHER R/AT NO.43/53, 15TH CROSS, 2ND PHASE, J.P. NAGAR, BENGALURU-560 078. …RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. V. SESHU, HCGP FOR R1 & R2)
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:7781 WP No. 29460 of 2023
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO: (I) CALL FOR ENTIRE RECORDS IN R.A(S).595/2018-19 PASSED BY THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, BENGALURU SOUTH SUB- DIVISION, AT BENGALURU; (II) SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 25.09.2020 PASSED IN R.A(S).595/2018-19 PASSED BY THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, BENGALURU SOUTH SUB- DIVISION, AT BENGALURU AND DISMISS THE APPEAL IN R.A(S).595/2018-19 AND ALSO SET ASIDE THE ORDER IN CASE NO.R.P.NO.220/2020 DATED 31.10.2023 PASSED BY THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT, BANGALORE BY ALLOWING THIS WRIT PETITION; AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS
ORAL ORDER
On 3.2.2026, the following order was passed:
“Finally, a week's time is granted at the request of
learned counsel for petitioner for compliance of office objections. If office objections are not complied, list this matter on 10.02.2026 for dismissal.”
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:7781 WP No. 29460 of 2023
2. Matter is called out. There is no representation for the petitioner. Office objections have not been complied. Consequently, the petition stands dismissed for non-compliance of office objections.
Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE
TL List No.: 2 Sl No.: 2