Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16132 (JHR)

RAJU CHAKRABORTY ALIAS NAYAN CHAKRABORTY v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./2989/2026 · 2026-06-10

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:16682] -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 2989 of 2026 Raju Chakraborty @ Nayan Chakarborty, Aged about 48 Years, Son of Krishna Chandra Chakraborty, Resident of House No. 46, Near Durga Mandir, Bagdigi Basti, Majhiladi Bhulan Bararee, P.O. Jorapokhar, P.S. Jorapokhar, District- Dhanbad. ..... … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ..... … Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Ranjan Kumar, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Anuradha Sahay, A.P.P. ------ 03/ 10.06.2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Tisra P.S. Case No. 71 of 2024, registered for the offence under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 303(2), 324(6), 326(f), 61(2)(a) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 3/4 of the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984, pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate, Dhanbad. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that altogether 38 named accused persons are there, however, the allegations are there that more than 100 people were assembled at the place of occurrence. He further submits that the agitation was going on due to death of one boy of the same village, for which, prior to the present FIR, one FIR was registered. He then submits that there are general and omnibus allegations against all the accused persons including this petitioner. He also submits that in the similar circumstance, the other co-accused persons have already been provided [2026:JHHC:16682] -2- the privilege of anticipatory bail in A.B.A. No. 5844 of 2025 by this court. 4. Learned A.P.P. appearing for the State has opposed the prayer and submits that the allegations are there of pelting stones. 5. Considering that there are general and omnibus allegations and 38 persons are named in the FIR and the FIR is also lodged against more than 100 more unknown persons and further in the similar circumstance, the other co-accused persons have already been provided the privilege of anticipatory bail in the aforementioned A.B.A. by this court, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, above named. 6. Accordingly, the petitioner, named above, is directed to surrender before the learned court within three weeks from today and in the event of his surrender / arrest, the petitioner shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, Dhanbad, in connection with Tisra P.S. Case No. 71 of 2024, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated:-10.06.2026 Amitesh/-