Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16131 (RAJ)

VINOD S/O SHRI RAMKISHORE RATHORE v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

HC/15/2026 · 2026-01-30

Chandra Prakash Shrimali, Mahendar Kumar Goyal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:4295-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Habeas Corpus Petition No. 15/2026 Vinod S/o Shri Ramkishore Rathore, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Plot No. 29-A, Krishnapuri, Ramgarh Mod, Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary Home Department, Secretariat, Jaipur, Raj. 2. The Director General Of Police, Police Head Quarter, Lalkothi, Jaipur (Raj.) 3. Additional Director General Of Police, Anti Human Traffic Unit, Rajasthan Jaipur. 4. The Commissioner Of Police, Police Commissionerate, Govt. Hostel, M.i. Road, Jaipur. 5. The Deputy Commissioner Of Police, Jaipur (North) 6. Sho, Police Station Brahampuri, District Jaipur City (North) 7. Sumit S/o Rampal Chak, R/o Village And Post Rudayam, Tehsil Kayamganj, District Farrukhabad, Uttar Pradesh. 8. Rampal S/o Khansahyachak, R/o Village And Post Rudayam, Tehsil Kayamganj, District Farrukhabad, Uttar Pradesh. 9. Sanjesh S/o Rampla, R/o Village And Post Rudayam, Tehsil Kayamganj, District Farrukhabad, Uttar Pradesh. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Suresh Kumar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajesh Choudhary, GA-cum-AAG with Mr. Aman Agarwal Ms. Neha Goyal and Mr. Vinod Sharma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SHRIMALI Order 30/01/2026 [2026:RJ-JP:4295-DB] (2 of 2) [HC-15/2026] In view of the status report dated 29.01.2026 submitted by learned Government Advocate-cum-Additional Advocate General, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press this habeas corpus petition. The petition is dismissed accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of accordingly. (CHANDRA PRAKASH SHRIMALI),J (MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J DIKSHA /3