Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 16131 (KAR)

SMT SUSHEELA v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/2530/2026 · 2026-04-15

R Devdas

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:20410 WP No. 2530 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 2530 OF 2026 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. SUSHEELA W/O G.S.LINGANNA AGE 52 YEARS, OCC : AGRICULTURE, 2. SRI. K.T. RAMACHANDRA, S/O THIMMARAIAH AGE 58 YEARS, OCC : AGRICULTURE, 3. SRI. K.M LAXMANA GOUDA, S/O MARANNA, AGE 70 YEARS, OCC : AGRICULTURE, ALL ARE R/O KEMPADYAPANAHALLI VILLAGE, BIDADI HOBLI, TALUK AND DIST. RAMNAGARA, RAMNAGARA-562 109. …PETITIONERS (BY SMT. GEETHA A., ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by JUANITA THEJESWINI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:20410 WP No. 2530 of 2026 AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, M.S. BUILDING, BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, RAMANAGARA, TQ AND DIST- RAMANAGARA PIN CODE - 562 159. 3. THE TAHSILDAR, RAMANAGARA TALUK, RAMANAGARA- 562 159. …RESPONDENTS (BY MR.S.R.KHAMRPZ KHAN, AGA) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 27-10-2025 VIDE ANNEXURE-E PASSED BY RESPONDENT NO.2 TO THE WRIT PETITION INSOFAR AS PETITIONERS ARE CONCERNED AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:20410 WP No. 2530 of 2026 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER Learned Additional Government Advocate is directed to take notice for all the respondents. 2. Learned Additional Government Advocate raises a preliminary objection that the order impugned at Annexure-E is passed by the Assistant Commissioner, Ramanagara Sub- Division, invoking Rule 108(K) of the Karnataka Land Revenue Rules, 1966 (for short 'the Rules') while cancelling the grant made in favour of the petitioner. Such an order if considered as original order passed by the Assistant Commissioner under Rule 108(K) of the Rules, then the appeal would lie to the Deputy Commissioner under Section 49(b) of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 (for short 'the Act'). If the order impugned is considered an order under appeal under Section 49(b) of the Act, then a second appeal would lie to the Deputy Commissioner under Section 50 of the Act. Accepting the submissions made by the learned Additional Government Advocate, writ petition stands disposed - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:20410 WP No. 2530 of 2026 of reserving liberty of the petitioners to approach the Deputy Commissioner. Learned Additional Government Advocate is permitted to file memo of appearance within a period of four weeks from today. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE GPG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 3