M/S SOHGAURA BROTHERS v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ANOTHER
WTAX/2580/2026 · 2026-05-17
Saumitra Dayal Singh, Swarupama Chaturvedi
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1613 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1613 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT TAX No. - 2580 of 2026 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SAUMITRA DAYAL SINGH, J.
HON'BLE SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.
2. Challenge has been raised to the ex parte Adjudication Order dated 30.04.2024 passed under Section 73 of the U.P.G.S.T. Act, 2017.
3. Preliminary objection has been raised that the petitioner has alternative remedy of appeal.
4. On the issue of limitation, reliance has been placed on M/S Shree Shakti Infra Vs. State of U.P. & Anr., 2026:AHC:277-DB, following another order passed in M/S Bambino Agro Industries Ltd. Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr., 2025:AHC:229995-DB.
5. In view of the above, it appears, the petitioner has statutory remedy of appeal available to it. Leaving that course open, interference claimed is declined.
6. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of. May 18, 2026 Shiv Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anand Kumar Jaiswal, Nanda Kumar Shukla, Shiv Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Swarupama Chaturvedi,J.) (Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.) M/S Sohgaura Brothers .....Petitioner(s) State Of Uttar Pradesh And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SHIV KUMAR SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad