KALAMUDDIN S/O SHABBIR KHAN v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/1442/2026 · 2026-02-02
Ganesh Ram Meena
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16126 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16126 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:4667] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 2nd Bail Application No. 1442/2026 Kalamuddin S/o Shabbir Khan, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Pachiplya, Police Station Mantown, At Present Resident Of Vigyan Nagar, Ranthambore Road, Police Station Kotwali Sawai Madhopur. (At Present Confined In District Jail Sawai Madhopur). ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tarun Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, P.P.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Order 02/02/2026
1. This 2nd bail application has been filed by the petitioner under Section 483 of the B.N.S.S. in connection with FIR No. 326/2025 registered at Police Station Kotwali Sawai Madhopur, District Sawai Madhopur for offences u/S 319(2), 318(4) of BNS 2023 and u/S 66D of Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and he is in custody since
26.10.2025. Counsel further submits that Police after completion of investigation has submitted charge-sheet in the matter and the petitioner is no more required for any kind of interrogation or recovery. He also submits that there is no other criminal case of allegation of cyber fraud has been registered against the accused- petitioner. Counsel further submits that trial of the case will take its own time, therefore, petitioner may be released on bail.
[2026:RJ-JP:4667] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-1442/2026]
3. Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State opposed the bail application.
4. Considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor.
5. Having regard to the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner so also the fact that Police after completion of investigation has submitted charge-sheet in the matter, this Court without expressing any opinion on merits or demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.
6. Accordingly, this bail application is allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner shall be released on bail provided he shall furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac Only), together with two sureties in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court or any other Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
(GANESH RAM MEENA),J SHRUTI SHARMA /8