2026:JHHC:16638 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI ---- A.B.A. No. 2982 of 2026 ---- Gokul Acharya, aged about 21 years, son of Badal Acharya @ Radha Kalindi, resident of Bansimali, Radhanagar, PO Radhanagar, PS Balidih, District Bokaro, Jharkhand .... Petitioner -- Versus -- The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI --- For the Petitioner :- Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate For the State :- Mr. Someshwar Roy, Advocate ---- 2/10.06.2026 Heard learned counsels for petitioner and for State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Balidih PS Case No.351 of 2025, for offence registered under section 191(2), 191(3), 190, 333, 127(1), 127(2), 115(2), 351(2), 352, 109, 303(2), 324(4), 117(2), 118(1) of BNS, 2023, pending in court of learned SDJM, Bokaro. 3. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and the allegations are made that the petitioners and others along with the informant were playing cards and during the said gambling altercation took place. He next submits that in the FIR the name of the father of the petitioner is said to be Radha Kalindi, whereas the name of father of this petitioner is Badal Acharya. He produced the Aadhar Card and submits that in the said Aadhar Card the name of the father of this petitioner is said to be Badal Acharya. The said copy of the Aadhar Card is taken on record. On these grounds he submits that 2026:JHHC:16638 2 anticipatory bail may kindly be granted. 4. Learned State counsel opposes prayer and submits that the allegations are there of gambling in front of the house of the informant and assault and in view of that anticipatory bail may kindly be rejected. 5. In the Aadhar Card, the name of the father of this petitioner is said to be Badal Acharya wherein in the FIR, the name of the father of this petitioner is disclosed as Radha Kalindi and on query by this Court, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that due to the defect pointed out by the Office, the petitioner has added the name of his father as Badal @ Radha Kalindi also, and in the attending facts and circumstances of the present case, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to petitioner. 6. Accordingly, petitioner, above named, is hereby directed to surrender before learned court within three weeks from today, and in event of his surrender/arrest, petitioner, above named, shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand), with two sureties of like amount each, to satisfaction of learned SDJM, Bokaro, in connection with Balidih PS Case No.351 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 482(2) of Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023. ( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) 10.06.2026 SI/