RAHUL URF REFER S/O GHANSHYAM v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/1227/2026 · 2026-01-23
Ganesh Ram Meena
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16123 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 16123 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:3142] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1227/2026 Rahul Urf Refer S/o Ghanshyam, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Gandhi Colony, Police Station Kotwali Baran District Baran. (Presently Confined In District Jail Baran). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Aman Ali For Respondent(s) : Ms. Aarti Sharma, P.P.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Order 23/01/2026
1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 on behalf of accused-petitioner in connection with FIR No. 478/2025 registered at Police Station Kotwali Baran, District Baran for offence under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 189(2) and 110 of BNS, 2023.
2.
Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the allegation against the accused-petitioner is of inflicting injury with a knife, which is a sharp edged weapon. He further submits that the injury which has been opined to be grievous in nature, sustained by the injured Dilip Prajapati, is said to be caused by a blunt weapon. He further submits that none of the injuries caused by sharp edged weapon, has been opined to be grievous in nature.
Learned counsel further submits that the accused-petitioner is in
[2026:RJ-JP:3142] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-1227/2026] custody since 30.10.2025 and police after investigation has submitted charge-sheet in the matter. He also submits that trial of the case is likely to take considerable time to conclude, therefore, the petitioner may be enlarged on bail.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail application.
4. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstance of the case and more particularly the fact that the allegation against the accused-petitioner is of causing injury by sharp edged weapon, whereas, the injury sustained by the injured, which has been opined to be grievous in nature, is caused by a blunt weapon, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits or demerits of the case deems just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail.
5. Accordingly, this bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner named above shall be enlarged on bail provided, he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- together with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for their appearance before the Court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
(GANESH RAM MEENA),J SHRUTI SHARMA /7